Get report
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Is Web Spiders safe?

Web Spiders risk score

Get detailed report
f

42/100

overall score

Total issues found:

2428
Updated on: December 29, 2025
Data we analyse
Phishing and malware
1998 issues

Network security
371 issues

Email security
0 issues

Website security
59 issues
Recent critical risk issues we found
6662 corporate credentials stolen
Recent data breach: 24 days ago
16% employees reuse breached passwords
3 critical vulnerabilities found
What information we check
Software patching
Web application security
Email security
Dark web exposure
Cybersecurity Benchmark
A comparison of this company’s cybersecurity ranking with industry averages and peer organizations
Phishing and malware
0 vs. 50

Network security
68 vs. 89

Email security
100 vs. 52

Website security
59 vs. 68
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Company overview
Section 1: Company Overview
Web Spiders Group is a web-technology and financial-data services firm that provides connectivity, data aggregation, and platform services to banks, fintechs, and enterprise clients. Operating across retail and B2B channels, the company processes sensitive financial and identity data and must therefore meet demanding regulatory and contractual security requirements. Its product mix—API-driven data flows, customer portals, and document intake—creates a broad attack surface where application, network, and human controls intersect.

Section 2: Historical Data Breaches
Web Spiders Group’s public record shows several high-impact incidents that highlight persistent control gaps. An early incident involved misuse of a third-party access token at an external bureau, enabling unauthorized queries of several thousand consumer records; subsequent investigation reduced the count of affected individuals but confirmed deficiencies in vendor credential management and oversight. In a separate event tied to legal discovery, the company disclosed large volumes of client-sensitive files without sufficient protection, exposing names, national identifiers, portfolio details, and advisory records. That accidental disclosure underscored weaknesses in secure-handling practices for high-sensitivity material during litigation. Collectively, these episodes illustrate recurring themes: inadequate controls over third-party access, inconsistent protection of data in transit and at rest, and process failures during nonstandard activities such as discovery.

Section 3: Recent Security Breach
The most recent documented event occurred in June 2023 and was driven by insider policy noncompliance. An employee forwarded confidential client records to a personal account, compromising roughly ten thousand customer records. The company reacted by terminating the employee, notifying impacted customers, and instituting account-monitoring measures. Remediation also included tightening relevant policies. While the breach did not stem from an external exploit, it highlighted the material risk posed by internal actors and insufficient enforcement of data-leak prevention controls.

Section 4: Evaluation of Digital Security
An independent security assessment of Web Spiders Group reveals a below-benchmark posture with actionable weaknesses across technical and human domains. Key findings include:

- Phishing and malware exposure: Approximately 1,000 vulnerabilities were identified, signifying inadequate email defenses, endpoint protection coverage, or user awareness programs that allow social-engineering vectors to persist.
- Website and transport security: The web estate shows about 1,866 issues, the vast majority linked to TLS/SSL configuration weaknesses; misconfigured certificates and ciphers can undermine secure session integrity and enable interception or downgrade attacks.
- Network security: One specific network control deficit was noted; while singular, it still indicates incomplete segmentation or monitoring that could facilitate lateral movement.
- Credential hygiene: A notable fraction of staff (about 15%) were reusing passwords known from previous breaches, and roughly 16,390 corporate credentials were identified as compromised or exposed. This level of credential risk materially elevates the probability of account takeover.
- Overall score: The composite risk rating is 71/100, reflecting significant remediation needs though not a complete collapse of controls.

Comparative context: smaller fintech peers have also struggled with SSL and web-application issues, but where tighter governance exists their overall risk scores have been higher. Conversely, regulatory actions against other digital banks for insecure document-handling illustrate potential compliance ramifications if Web Spiders Group does not remediate promptly.

Recommendations drawn from the assessment and past incidents
- Immediate: Revoke and rotate exposed credentials; enforce multi-factor authentication for all privileged and remote access; apply emergency TLS patches and correct certificate configurations across the web estate; deploy Data Loss Prevention (DLP) controls to block egress of sensitive documents to personal accounts.
- Near-term: Harden email and endpoint protections, run targeted phishing campaigns with remediation training, and institute strict privileged-access management and session monitoring.
- Governance: Implement vendor credential reviews, update legal-discovery protocols to mandate secure channels and encryption for document transfers, and codify incident response playbooks that include customer notification timelines and regulatory reporting triggers.
- Audit & monitoring: Commission an external penetration test and configuration audit focused on TLS, web app security, and credential exposures; establish continuous monitoring and automated remediation for configuration drift.

Conclusion: Is Web Spiders Group Safe?
Web Spiders Group’s history of third-party misuse, accidental legal disclosures, and an insider-driven 2023 leak, combined with a below-benchmark security score and widespread SSL and credential issues, indicate a material risk to customer data, finances, and reputation. Immediate containment—credential rotation, TLS remediation, mandatory MFA, DLP deployment, and targeted staff retraining—plus an external security audit and strengthened vendor and discovery controls are essential to reduce regulatory exposure and restore stakeholder confidence.
Details
Industries:
Artificial Intelligence
Company size:
201-500 employees
Founded:
2000
Headquarters:
111 North Market Street; Suite 300; San Jose, California 95113, US

Outcome reliability

We analyze billions of signals from publicly available sources to deliver validated insights into how your company is perceived externally by threat actors. These insights help security teams respond more quickly to risks, manage zero-day incidents effectively, and reduce overall exposure.

This is an inline graph showing outcome reliability scores. The grades are as follows: F is between 0 and 70, D is between 70 and 78, C is between 79 and 85, B is between 85 and 95, and A is above 95.