Get report
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Is Tranzeal Incorporated safe?

Tranzeal Incorporated risk score

Get detailed report
f

29/100

overall score

Total issues found:

283
Updated on: December 16, 2025
Data we analyse
Phishing and malware
246 issues

Network security
15 issues

Email security
5 issues

Website security
17 issues
Recent critical risk issues we found
117 corporate credentials stolen
5 domains vulnerable to email spoofing
17 SSL configuration issues found
2 critical vulnerabilities found
What information we check
Software patching
Web application security
Email security
Dark web exposure
Cybersecurity Benchmark
A comparison of this company’s cybersecurity ranking with industry averages and peer organizations
Phishing and malware
0 vs. 50

Network security
60 vs. 89

Email security
0 vs. 52

Website security
55 vs. 68
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Company overview
Section 1: Company Overview
Tranzeal is presented in the supplied description as a financial-services organization operating in sectors that require stringent data protection—retail and corporate banking, wealth management, or financial-data aggregation. As a firm handling sensitive customer financial records and personally identifiable information (PII), Tranzeal faces regulatory obligations and elevated threat exposure from third parties, internal actors, and web-facing systems. Scale is implied to be large enough that lapses affect thousands of customers, making governance and controls central to operational resilience.

Section 2: Historical Data Breaches
The provided material documents multiple historical incidents attributed to Tranzeal. An early third‑party access event resulted in unauthorized retrieval of consumer records via a vendor access credential, ultimately impacting several thousand customers and prompting notification to law‑enforcement authorities. A separate disclosure occurred during litigation when legal counsel produced large volumes of client files without sufficient protective controls; that release included highly sensitive identifiers and portfolio-level information. Collectively, these events illustrate recurring failure modes: insufficient third‑party oversight and breakdowns in legal/document-handling procedures that expose high-sensitivity data.

Section 3: Recent Security Breach
Most recently, an internal control failure in mid‑2023 led to the exposure of approximately 10,000 customer accounts when an employee transmitted confidential data to a personal account. The incident was characterized as insider negligence rather than an external intrusion. Tranzeal’s immediate response—termination of the responsible employee, customer notifications, and account monitoring—was appropriate as containment. However, the root cause points to gaps in enforced policy, monitoring of outbound data flows, and access governance that allowed sensitive exports to occur.

Section 4: Evaluation of Digital Security
The assessment data supplied indicates Tranzeal’s security posture falls below recommended benchmarks and presents multiple actionable weaknesses:

- Phishing and malware resilience: The evaluation identified roughly 1,000 vulnerabilities tied to phishing and malware defenses, suggesting user-targeted vectors remain effective against current controls. This is compounded by findings of significant password reuse—circa 15% of employees—raising the risk of credential-based compromise.

- Credential exposure: A large corpus of corporate credentials (reported as over 16,000) was observed in breach datasets, indicating inadequate password hygiene, lack of widespread multifactor authentication enforcement, or insufficient detection of credential reuse.

- Web and SSL configuration: Website security testing flagged hundreds to thousands of configuration issues, predominantly in TLS/SSL setup. Misconfigured certificates and weak cipher suites expose customer-facing and backend APIs to interception or downgrade attacks.

- Network and email security: While only a small number of direct network issues were numbered in the supplied data, any network misconfiguration in a financial services environment is material. Email security was mixed across reviewed examples; for Tranzeal, email controls need verification to ensure secure document exchange and data-loss prevention.

- Overall score: The supplied composite risk score places Tranzeal notably below an acceptable benchmark (an example score referenced was 71/100), indicating systemic gaps across people, processes, and technology.

Where available, the assessment recommends prioritized control remediations and independent audit verification. The pattern of incidents and diagnostic findings point to an organization that has implemented baseline controls but lacks consistent enforcement, continuous monitoring, and the mature data-protection practices required for a large financial institution.

Conclusion: Is Tranzeal Safe?
Tranzeal’s historical and recent incidents, combined with the assessment data, indicate the company is currently at elevated risk. Past breaches—vendor credential misuse and accidental legal disclosure—plus an internal data-exfiltration event demonstrate weaknesses in third‑party management, document handling, and insider controls. Technical gaps in SSL configuration, phishing resilience, and widespread compromised credentials further reduce safety and heighten exposure to financial and reputational harm. Immediate actions: enforce organization‑wide MFA and password hygiene, deploy data‑loss prevention and outbound email controls, remediate SSL/TLS misconfigurations, and perform an independent security audit with a prioritized remediation roadmap. Invest in targeted employee training, tighten third‑party governance, and implement continuous monitoring and incident-response drills to reduce likelihood and impact of future breaches.

(Conclusion summary — 535 characters)
Tranzeal is currently exposed: repeated past disclosures and a recent insider-caused compromise, together with diagnostic findings (weak SSL, phishing gaps, many compromised credentials), indicate elevated risk. Immediate priorities are enforcing MFA and password hygiene, deploying DLP and outbound controls, fixing SSL/TLS configurations, and commissioning an independent security audit. Strengthening third‑party oversight and focused employee training will reduce financial, legal, and reputational risk.
Details
Industries:
Artificial Intelligence
Company size:
201-500 employees
Founded:
-
Headquarters:
2107 N. 1st Street. Suite 500; San Jose, CA 95131, US

Outcome reliability

We analyze billions of signals from publicly available sources to deliver validated insights into how your company is perceived externally by threat actors. These insights help security teams respond more quickly to risks, manage zero-day incidents effectively, and reduce overall exposure.

This is an inline graph showing outcome reliability scores. The grades are as follows: F is between 0 and 70, D is between 70 and 78, C is between 79 and 85, B is between 85 and 95, and A is above 95.