Get report
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Is Top Man safe?

Top Man risk score

Get detailed report
d

71/100

overall score

Total issues found:

20308
Updated on: November 14, 2025
Data we analyse
Phishing and malware
20129 issues

Network security
1 issue

Email security
0 issues

Website security
178 issues
Recent critical risk issues we found
3977 corporate credentials stolen
10% employees reuse breached passwords
175 SSL configuration issues found
Only 26% of systems cloud-hosted
What information we check
Software patching
Web application security
Email security
Dark web exposure
Cybersecurity Benchmark
A comparison of this company’s cybersecurity ranking with industry averages and peer organizations
Phishing and malware
0 vs. 34

Network security
100 vs. 98

Email security
100 vs. 93

Website security
65 vs. 75
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Company overview
Section 1: Company Overview
Asos plc is a UK-based online fashion retailer and e-commerce platform that serves a global customer base. Founded in 2000 and headquartered in London, Asos combines direct-to-consumer retail with marketplace services, handling high volumes of personal and payment data across multiple jurisdictions. Its business model relies on seamless web and mobile experiences, extensive third-party integrations (payments, logistics, marketing analytics), and a large workforce operating customer service, IT, and commercial functions. These characteristics create a broad attack surface and place Asos squarely within high regulatory scrutiny for data protection and consumer privacy.

Section 2: Historical Data Breaches
The source material for this assessment did not enumerate specific, documented historical breaches attributed to Asos. In lieu of company-specific incident reports, the description emphasized common risk vectors that have affected comparable retailers: accidental disclosures, insider mishandling of customer data, third‑party vendor weaknesses, and web-application vulnerabilities. Absence of publicly supplied breach events in the brief should not be interpreted as evidence of perfect security; rather, it highlights the need for proactive evidence-based controls, continuous monitoring, and transparent incident reporting. Retailers with Asos’s profile frequently face supply-chain and credential-based incidents, making vigilance essential.

Section 3: Recent Security Breach
[Omitted — no recent breach details were supplied in the description.]

Section 4: Evaluation of Digital Security
The provided assessment flags material shortcomings across several control domains that are particularly relevant to an online retailer like Asos.

- Phishing and Malware Resistance: The description indicates elevated susceptibility to social-engineering vectors. Retail organizations depend on front-line employees and customer service agents who, if targeted successfully, can inadvertently expose credentials or customer records. The cited concerns suggest anti-phishing controls, endpoint protection, and user training are either immature or inconsistently applied.

- Website and TLS/SSL Posture: Weaknesses in website configuration and encryption were highlighted. Misconfigured TLS/SSL and web-stack components increase the risk of data interception, session hijacking, and automated exploit campaigns. For an e-commerce platform where checkout and account management are central, these are high-priority fix items.

- Credential Hygiene and Access Management: The assessment noted extensive compromised corporate credentials and a nontrivial rate of password reuse among employees. This combination dramatically raises the probability of account takeover, lateral movement, and unauthorized access to customer data. Absent strong multi-factor authentication (MFA) and rigorous credential rotation, credential compromise remains a dominant threat.

- Network and Monitoring Controls: Gaps were identified in network security and ongoing monitoring. For Asos, effective segmentation between customer-facing systems, internal administrative networks, and third-party integrations is critical. Limited detection capabilities lengthen dwell time and complicate incident containment.

- Third-Party Risk and Data Handling: Given Asos’s reliance on external services (payment processors, fulfilment partners, analytics vendors), weaknesses in supplier controls or the secure handling of customer-submitted documents amplify systemic risk. The description suggests these pathways require stronger contractual and technical safeguards.

- Risk Scoring and Audit Findings: The overall posture was characterized as below recommended benchmarks in the brief. That implies an elevated aggregate risk exposure and signals a need for prioritized remediation informed by external penetration testing, code review, and configuration audits.

Recommendations (priority sequence)
1. Enforce organization‑wide MFA and immediate credential rotation for any exposed accounts.
2. Remediate TLS/SSL and web-application misconfigurations; adopt automated certificate management and hardened cipher suites.
3. Deploy/upgrade endpoint detection and response (EDR), data loss prevention (DLP), and a centralized SIEM with threat-hunting capability.
4. Implement strict network segmentation and least-privilege access for administrative systems and APIs.
5. Run external penetration tests and web-application assessments, then remediate findings within a risk-prioritized SLA.
6. Strengthen third‑party security governance: inventory vendors, require attestations (SOC2/ISO), and insert secure data‑handling clauses.
7. Mandate regular, role-based security training emphasizing phishing resistance and secure handling of customer data.
8. Formalize incident response playbooks, forensic readiness, and customer-notification procedures to accelerate containment and regulatory compliance.

Conclusion: Is Asos Safe?
The provided assessment portrays Asos as exposed to a range of realistic threats—phishing and malware vectors, web and TLS misconfigurations, compromised credentials, and network/monitoring gaps—placing its data and operations at elevated risk. While no specific historical breaches were described, the identified weaknesses warrant immediate remediation to reduce financial, regulatory, and reputational consequences. Prioritizing MFA, credential remediation, TLS fixes, robust monitoring, vendor controls, and targeted testing will materially improve security outcomes.

Summary (500–600 characters)
The assessment indicates Asos faces elevated risk due to phishing/malware susceptibility, weak TLS/SSL and website configurations, network-monitoring gaps, and widespread credential compromise and password reuse. Immediate steps: enforce MFA, rotate and revoke exposed credentials, remediate TLS/web-stack issues, deploy DLP/EDR/SIEM, run external penetration testing, harden vendor controls, and institute mandatory security training to reduce regulatory, financial, and reputational exposure.
Details
Industries:
Retail & eCommerce
Company size:
51-200 employees
Founded:
-
Headquarters:
2842 Rue de Salaberry; Montreal, Quebec H3M, CA

Outcome reliability

We analyze billions of signals from publicly available sources to deliver validated insights into how your company is perceived externally by threat actors. These insights help security teams respond more quickly to risks, manage zero-day incidents effectively, and reduce overall exposure.

This is an inline graph showing outcome reliability scores. The grades are as follows: F is between 0 and 70, D is between 70 and 78, C is between 79 and 85, B is between 85 and 95, and A is above 95.