Get report
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Is Symend safe?

Symend risk score

Get detailed report
f

62/100

overall score

Total issues found:

294
Updated on: December 16, 2025
Data we analyse
Phishing and malware
227 issues

Network security
14 issues

Email security
1 issue

Website security
52 issues
Recent critical risk issues we found
21 corporate credentials stolen
43 SSL configuration issues found
2 critical vulnerabilities found
4 high-risk vulnerabilities detected
What information we check
Software patching
Web application security
Email security
Dark web exposure
Cybersecurity Benchmark
A comparison of this company’s cybersecurity ranking with industry averages and peer organizations
Phishing and malware
0 vs. 50

Network security
91 vs. 89

Email security
97 vs. 52

Website security
58 vs. 68
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Company overview
Section 1: Company Overview
Symend is a customer-engagement technology firm that applies behavioral science and data-driven communications to improve outcomes in collections, retention, and customer recovery. Headquartered in Canada, the company serves utilities, telecoms, insurers, and financial services firms with a platform that combines analytics, messaging orchestration, and campaign automation. As a data-centric SaaS provider handling sensitive financial and personal information, Symend operates under regulatory scrutiny related to privacy and data protection and must maintain robust controls across cloud infrastructure, integrations, and third-party relationships.

Section 2: Historical Data Breaches
No company-specific breach details were supplied in the description. Based on the absence of confirmed, publicly disclosed incidents in the provided material, there is no attribution of past major data compromises tied to Symend in this report. That said, absence of reported breaches does not equate to absence of risk; smaller incidents, near-misses, or unpublicized internal events can occur and should be investigated during any formal security assessment. A full historical review requires access to incident logs, regulatory filings, and public disclosures.

Section 3: Recent Security Breach
(Omitted — no recent breach information provided)
The supplied description did not include any recent incident specifics. If there is a recent breach or near-miss, include a timeline, affected systems, root cause analysis, and remediation actions so they can be evaluated and incorporated here.

Section 4: Evaluation of Digital Security
With no bespoke technical audit data attached to the description, the assessment below synthesizes typical exposures for a business-model equivalent to Symend and identifies controls that demand attention based on industry best practices and the patterns seen in similar fintech/SaaS environments.

- Data in transit and at rest: Symend handles PII and financial metadata. Ensure TLS configurations follow current recommendations (disable deprecated protocols and weak ciphers), enforce strict transport security, and use strong KMS-backed encryption for persisted data. Misconfigured SSL/TLS and expired certificates are common weaknesses in comparable firms and should be validated by automated scanning.

- Identity and access management: For client data segregation and least-privilege enforcement, implement role-based access control (RBAC), just-in-time elevation for administrative tasks, and organization-wide multi-factor authentication (MFA). Credential hygiene must be enforced via enterprise password policies, rotation, and monitoring for leaked credentials on public repositories and breach feeds.

- Insider risk and data exfiltration: Given Symend’s access to customer accounts and payment-related workflows, insider error or malicious action is a material risk. Deploy DLP controls, email and outbound traffic monitoring, and robust endpoint protection. Logging and behavioral analytics can detect unusual access patterns or bulk exports.

- Application and website security: Secure software development lifecycle (SSDLC) practices are essential: static/dynamic code analysis, dependency scanning (to catch known vulnerable libraries), and regular third-party penetration testing. Web application firewalls and runtime application self-protection (RASP) help mitigate common web-layer attacks.

- Network and infrastructure: Use segmented network architectures, least-privilege security groups, and hardened baselines for cloud instances. Continuous vulnerability scanning and an established patch management cadence reduce exposure windows for discovered flaws.

- Third-party and API security: Symend integrates with clients and data sources via APIs. Enforce strong authentication (mutual TLS, OAuth), rate limiting, and schema validation. Contractual security requirements and periodic third-party security reviews are necessary to manage supply-chain risk.

- Monitoring, detection, and response: Maintain centralized logging, real-time alerting, and a tested incident response plan that includes communication playbooks for clients and regulators. Consider a dedicated SOC or an MSSP partnership for 24/7 coverage if not already in place.

- Governance and compliance: Align with relevant frameworks (NIST CSF, ISO 27001, SOC 2) and maintain privacy impact assessments where personal data processing occurs. Regular employee security awareness and role-specific training reduce phishing and social-engineering risks.

Recommended audits and expert validations include an external penetration test, a red-team exercise focusing on cloud and API attack paths, a SOC 2 Type II readiness review (or renewal), and a supply-chain security assessment. Engage an external digital-forensics partner to validate incident history when investigating unreported or legacy issues.

Conclusion: Is Symend Safe?
Symend’s business model inherently involves handling sensitive customer and financial data, which elevates its exposure to privacy and financial risk. In the absence of documented breaches provided with the brief, there’s no direct evidence of prior major compromises; however, comparable SaaS/fintech exposures—weak TLS configurations, credential reuse, insider error, and vulnerable third-party dependencies—are common risk drivers. Immediate priorities should be: validate TLS and certificate posture, enforce organization-wide MFA and credential monitoring, perform an external penetration test and dependency scan, and harden DLP and monitoring for insider activity. These measures will reduce financial, reputational, and privacy impact likelihood while supporting regulatory compliance and customer trust.
Details
Industries:
Artificial Intelligence
Company size:
51-200 employees
Founded:
2016
Headquarters:
411 1 St SE; #1700; Calgary, Alberta T2G, CA

Outcome reliability

We analyze billions of signals from publicly available sources to deliver validated insights into how your company is perceived externally by threat actors. These insights help security teams respond more quickly to risks, manage zero-day incidents effectively, and reduce overall exposure.

This is an inline graph showing outcome reliability scores. The grades are as follows: F is between 0 and 70, D is between 70 and 78, C is between 79 and 85, B is between 85 and 95, and A is above 95.