Is Softvan Pvt Ltd | A Sahana System Group Company. safe?
Softvan Pvt Ltd | A Sahana System Group Company. risk score
66/100
overall score
Total issues found:
255Updated on: December 2, 2025
Data we analyse
Phishing and malware
234
issues
Network security
2
issues
Email security
2
issues
Website security
17
issues
Recent critical risk issues we found
402 corporate credentials stolen
31% employees reuse breached passwords
17 SSL configuration issues found
Only 0% of systems CDN-protected
What information we check
Software patching
Web application security
Email security
Dark web exposure
Cybersecurity Benchmark
A comparison of this company’s cybersecurity ranking with industry averages and peer organizations
Phishing and malware
0
vs.
50
Network security
86
vs.
89
Email security
84
vs.
52
Website security
55
vs.
68
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Company overview
Section 1: Company OverviewSoftVan is a technology solutions provider that builds cloud-delivered platforms and bespoke software for enterprise customers. Its offerings span video delivery, conversational interfaces (chatbots and voice-controlled applications), connected-device solutions, and data-driven services including artificial intelligence, large-scale analytics, and business intelligence. SoftVan positions itself as a platform and systems integrator that accelerates digital transformation—helping clients migrate workloads to cloud infrastructure, operationalize data insights, and expose functionality via voice- and API-driven interfaces. Public details on corporate size and ownership are limited; the firm appears to operate across product engineering, managed services, and platform hosting for business customers.
Section 2: Historical Data Breaches
There are no publicly documented, confirmed data breaches tied specifically to SoftVan in the materials supplied. That absence of disclosure should not be interpreted as proof of an incident-free history: organizations in SoftVan’s market commonly experience incidents that are either handled internally, remediated before public disclosure, or disclosed under regulatory timelines. Given the company’s role as both a platform provider and systems integrator, any breach could have amplified effects — potentially exposing customer data, models, or connected-device ecosystems. Transparent incident reporting and routine third‑party attestations are therefore critical for stakeholders to assess historical security performance.
Section 3: Recent Security Breach
Omitted (no recent breach information provided).
Section 4: Evaluation of Digital Security
No formal audit data or security score was provided for SoftVan. Consequently, the following evaluation is an evidence‑based risk assessment derived from the company’s technology footprint and common weaknesses observed in comparable vendors.
Attack surface considerations
- Cloud services and hosting: Risks include misconfigurations (open storage, permissive IAM roles), inadequate encryption of data-at-rest and in-transit, and insufficient logging/monitoring.
- Video streaming: High exposure to volumetric DDoS, content protection gaps (unauthorized redistribution), and media‑server vulnerabilities that can enable remote code execution.
- Chatbots and voice systems: Threats include data leakage through logs, insecure handling of personally identifiable information (PII), prompt or injection attacks against NLP models, and voice‑spoofing or replay attacks.
- IoT and edge devices: Insecure firmware, weak device authentication, and unpatched device stacks create persistent footholds.
- AI and big-data pipelines: Model theft, training-data poisoning, inadequate access controls around datasets, and lack of model auditing or explainability increase regulatory and operational risk.
- Enterprise development practices: Exposed code repositories, CI/CD pipeline vulnerabilities, and insufficient software composition analysis (SCA) raise the likelihood of supply-chain compromise.
Control maturity indicators (recommended assessment items)
- Identity & Access Management: Verify organization-wide use of least privilege, role-based access, and multi-factor authentication for all administrative and developer accounts.
- Configuration & Patch Management: Assess automated patching for servers, device firmware, media servers, and third‑party components.
- Secure Development Lifecycle: Confirm SAST/DAST, code-review policies, dependency scanning, and hardened CI/CD pipelines.
- Data Protection: Confirm robust encryption standards, tokenization for PII, key management practices, and data retention minimization.
- Monitoring and Response: Evaluate centralized logging, SIEM/UEBA coverage, incident response runbooks, and regular tabletop exercises.
- Third-party risk management: Inventory subcontractors, SaaS integrations, and device manufacturers; require SOC 2/ISO27001 or equivalent evidence where appropriate.
Recommended assessments and expert validations
- External penetration testing covering cloud tenancy, streaming endpoints, and webhooks/APIs.
- Red-team exercise focusing on supply-chain scenarios (compromised SDKs, CI runners).
- Architecture and threat modeling for AI/data pipelines, including model governance reviews.
- Cloud configuration and exposure audit (CSPM) and automated secret-scanning across repositories.
Immediate remediation priorities
1. Perform an asset and data-mapping exercise to identify critical services, data flows, and high-risk integrations.
2. Enforce MFA, rotate credentials, and eliminate exposed secrets from codebases.
3. Apply cloud-hardening best practices (least-privilege IAM, encrypted buckets, logging to immutable stores).
4. Enable real-time monitoring with alerting on anomalous access and exfiltration indicators.
5. Harden IoT firmware update processes and require device attestation.
Business impact and compliance
A material security event could produce direct financial costs (remediation, customer compensation), regulatory penalties where data protection laws apply, and reputational harm affecting enterprise customer relationships. For customers operating in regulated sectors, evidence of third-party audits and ongoing vulnerability management will be decisive.
Conclusion: Is SoftVan Safe?
Publicly available information does not show confirmed breaches, but SoftVan’s broad technology footprint creates a substantial attack surface. Without independent audit data and demonstrable controls, risk is best described as moderate to high. Prioritize rapid asset inventory, cloud and credential hardening, secure SDLC practices, and rigorous third‑party assessments to reduce exposure and protect client data and services.
500–600 character summary and immediate recommendations:
SoftVan delivers cloud, streaming, conversational and IoT solutions with substantial attack surface but no public breach records provided. The lack of independent audit data leaves residual risk elevated. Immediate actions: inventory assets and data flows, enforce MFA and least privilege, remediate cloud misconfigurations, scan codebases for secrets, run external penetration tests, and implement SIEM/IR processes. These steps reduce financial, regulatory, and reputational exposure while strengthening long-term resilience.
Details
Website:
Industries:
Artificial Intelligence
Company size:
51-200 employees
Founded:
2014
Headquarters:
405, Sigma legacy, IIM Road; Ahmedabad , Gujrat 380015, IN
Outcome reliability
We analyze billions of signals from publicly available sources to deliver validated insights into how your company is perceived externally by threat actors. These insights help security teams respond more quickly to risks, manage zero-day incidents effectively, and reduce overall exposure.