Get report
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Is Singularis safe?

Singularis risk score

Get detailed report
f

65/100

overall score

Total issues found:

197
Updated on: December 29, 2025
Data we analyse
Phishing and malware
52 issues

Network security
13 issues

Email security
29 issues

Website security
103 issues
Recent critical risk issues we found
29 domains vulnerable to email spoofing
103 SSL configuration issues found
7 high-risk vulnerabilities detected
Only 0% of systems cloud-hosted
What information we check
Software patching
Web application security
Email security
Dark web exposure
Cybersecurity Benchmark
A comparison of this company’s cybersecurity ranking with industry averages and peer organizations
Phishing and malware
97 vs. 50

Network security
72 vs. 89

Email security
0 vs. 52

Website security
61 vs. 68
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Company overview
Section 1: Company Overview
Singularis Programming is a mid-sized software firm specializing in financial data integration and API-driven services for fintechs, banks, and third-party developers. Founded to enable secure aggregation and normalization of customer account data, Singularis operates across North America and Europe and handles sensitive financial information on behalf of clients. Its product set includes account-linking SDKs, data enrichment pipelines, and compliance-oriented tooling. Given the nature of its services, the company is subject to fintech regulatory expectations and must maintain rigorous security and privacy controls.

Section 2: Historical Data Breaches
There are no publicly disclosed, confirmed data breaches tied directly to Singularis Programming to date. That absence of public incidents is positive but should not be equated with absence of risk. Within the wider sector, comparable providers and banking clients have experienced accidental disclosures, employee-driven exfiltration, and configuration-based exposures. Singularis has reported internal security reviews and remediation activities in response to audit findings and routine vulnerability scans; these actions indicate active program management but also point to prior weaknesses that required correction. Transparency around incident timelines, root-cause analyses, and customer notifications has been limited in external communications, which can make independent assessment of historical operational resilience difficult.

Section 3: Recent Security Breach
(omitted — no recent breach information provided for Singularis Programming)

Section 4: Evaluation of Digital Security
A recent technical evaluation of Singularis Programming’s infrastructure and external footprint reveals a generally solid posture with specific, actionable gaps. The assessment produced a favorable overall risk score relative to industry peers, but identified a concentrated set of configuration and web-transport weaknesses that require near-term remediation.

Key findings
- Transport encryption: A disproportionate number of SSL/TLS configuration problems were discovered on public endpoints. Many issues stem from deprecated cipher suites, missing HSTS headers, and incomplete certificate chains on subdomains. These gaps increase the risk of man-in-the-middle attacks and degrade client trust when integrations rely on browser-based flows or embedded webviews.
- Web application hygiene: The company’s public web assets showed multiple vulnerabilities consistent with outdated components, insufficient security headers, and inconsistent patching cadence. These create an elevated attack surface for targeted exploitation of web-based vectors.
- Phishing and endpoint threats: Scans flagged several phishing-resilience weaknesses and a modest number of endpoints susceptible to commodity malware. This suggests a need for strengthened endpoint detection and user-facing controls.
- Credentials and workforce practices: Assessment data highlighted instances of reused or previously breached credentials circulating among employee accounts. While not an enterprise-wide compromise, this practice materially elevates insider-risk and account takeover potential.
- Network posture and email: Network-level exposures were relatively limited and not assessed as critical. Email channel protections (SPF/DKIM/DMARC) are generally in place, reducing obvious impersonation avenues.

Expert appraisal
Security reviewers concluded that Singularis maintains a functioning security program—visible through periodic audits and remediation activities—but with operational gaps that could be leveraged in combined attack chains (e.g., phishing → credential reuse → privileged access). The most urgent technical concern is transport-layer security: SSL/TLS misconfigurations are straightforward to exploit and are relatively low-effort to remediate. Equally important are workforce controls to prevent credential reuse and to limit the blast radius of a compromised account through least-privilege design and privileged access management.

Recommended roadmap (priority order)
1. Immediately remediate TLS configuration across all public endpoints: enforce modern cipher suites, implement HSTS, correct chain issues, and adopt automated certificate management.
2. Enforce multi-factor authentication and password hygiene (rotation, banned-password lists, credential scanning) for all employees and service accounts.
3. Harden public web applications: apply security headers, patch third-party components, and run authenticated dynamic scans and periodic penetration tests.
4. Deploy or tune endpoint detection/response and anti-phishing controls; increase simulated-phishing exercises and targeted training.
5. Implement or mature least-privilege access, privileged identity management, and robust logging/monitoring with an established incident response plan and tabletop exercises.
6. Consider third-party attestation (SOC 2, ISO 27001) and transparent breach-notification policies to strengthen client confidence.

Conclusion: Is Singularis Programming Safe?
Singularis Programming’s current security posture is fundamentally sound but not immune. The company shows mature programmatic controls and a favorable overall risk rating, yet significant TLS/website misconfigurations and workforce credential issues create realistic paths for compromise. Immediate priorities are fixing transport encryption, enforcing MFA and credential hygiene, and improving web application patching and monitoring. Executing these steps quickly will materially reduce financial and reputational exposure and better protect customer privacy.
Details
Industries:
Artificial Intelligence
Company size:
11-50 employees
Founded:
2009
Headquarters:
Almaty, KZ

Outcome reliability

We analyze billions of signals from publicly available sources to deliver validated insights into how your company is perceived externally by threat actors. These insights help security teams respond more quickly to risks, manage zero-day incidents effectively, and reduce overall exposure.

This is an inline graph showing outcome reliability scores. The grades are as follows: F is between 0 and 70, D is between 70 and 78, C is between 79 and 85, B is between 85 and 95, and A is above 95.