Get report
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Is Science Systems and Applications, Inc (SSAI) safe?

Science Systems and Applications, Inc (SSAI) risk score

Get detailed report
f

65/100

overall score

Total issues found:

3163
Updated on: December 29, 2025
Data we analyse
Phishing and malware
3143 issues

Network security
2 issues

Email security
4 issues

Website security
14 issues
Recent critical risk issues we found
248 corporate credentials stolen
14 SSL configuration issues found
1 domains vulnerable to email spoofing
3 domains potentially spoofable
What information we check
Software patching
Web application security
Email security
Dark web exposure
Cybersecurity Benchmark
A comparison of this company’s cybersecurity ranking with industry averages and peer organizations
Phishing and malware
0 vs. 50

Network security
97 vs. 89

Email security
80 vs. 52

Website security
55 vs. 68
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Company overview
I can prepare the requested 700‑word, structured security report for Science Systems and Applications, but the prompt indicates a description to be integrated and none was attached. Before I proceed, please confirm one of the following so I deliver exactly what you need:

1) Provide the specific description/inputs you want integrated (any breach history, recent incident details, or Serity-style evaluation data). I will incorporate them and avoid copying verbatim.
2) If you prefer, I can produce a 700‑word report based on the generic patterns and security findings in the earlier examples (Wells Fargo, Flinks, Openbank), adapted to Science Systems and Applications and clearly labeled as an inferred assessment rather than factual incident reporting.
3) I can draft a general, evidence‑free security assessment and prioritized remediation plan for Science Systems and Applications, noting where factual verification is required.

Also confirm whether you want the final Conclusion section to be exactly 500–600 characters (as required by the system instruction) and whether I should include any specific audience (CISO, board, clients) or technical depth.

Once you confirm which option and provide any missing details, I will produce the full report.
Details
Industries:
Artificial Intelligence
Company size:
501-1000 employees
Founded:
1977
Headquarters:
10210 Greenbelt Road, Suite 600; Lanham, MD 20706, US

Outcome reliability

We analyze billions of signals from publicly available sources to deliver validated insights into how your company is perceived externally by threat actors. These insights help security teams respond more quickly to risks, manage zero-day incidents effectively, and reduce overall exposure.

This is an inline graph showing outcome reliability scores. The grades are as follows: F is between 0 and 70, D is between 70 and 78, C is between 79 and 85, B is between 85 and 95, and A is above 95.