89/100
overall score
Total issues found:
409Updated on: December 29, 2025
Data we analyse
Phishing and malware
313
issues
Network security
1
issue
Email security
2
issues
Website security
93
issues
Recent critical risk issues we found
82 SSL configuration issues found
1 domains vulnerable to email spoofing
1 domains potentially spoofable
What information we check
Software patching
Web application security
Email security
Dark web exposure
Cybersecurity Benchmark
A comparison of this company’s cybersecurity ranking with industry averages and peer organizations
Phishing and malware
94
vs.
50
Network security
100
vs.
89
Email security
70
vs.
52
Website security
57
vs.
68
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Company overview
Section 1: Company OverviewRiggs Cat is a regional heavy-equipment dealer and service provider that supplies, rents, and maintains construction and industrial machinery. Its operations typically encompass sales, parts distribution, equipment servicing, telematics support, and fleet maintenance for commercial customers. Because Riggs Cat handles customer contracts, billing, employee payroll, warranty records, and potentially telematics/operational data from on-site equipment, it maintains a mix of regulated personal data (employee and customer PII), commercial confidential information, and operational machine data. These information flows, combined with an on-premises/service-center footprint and digital customer portals, make data protection and operational resilience core to business continuity and regulatory compliance.
Section 2: Historical Data Breaches
No specific historical breaches were documented in the description provided for Riggs Cat. In the absence of confirmed disclosures, there is no basis to allege prior large-scale compromises. Nonetheless, the heavy-equipment dealer sector commonly experiences low-and-slow incidents such as credential theft, lost or stolen devices containing PII, targeted phishing of staff with access to billing or invoicing systems, and third-party exposures via vendors providing telematics, parts procurement, or payroll processing. Such patterns are important context: even organizations without public breach records can have latent vulnerabilities that elevate risk.
Section 3: Recent Security Breach
[Omitted — no recent breach data provided]
Section 4: Evaluation of Digital Security
With no company-specific audit data supplied, this evaluation synthesizes likely risk vectors for Riggs Cat and prescribes priority mitigations. Key threat areas for comparable dealers include:
- Credential and Access Risk: Sales, service, and parts staff commonly access CRM, ERP, and payment systems. Without strict access controls, lateral movement from a single compromised account can expose invoices, customer contracts, and payroll data. Enforce least-privilege roles, multi-factor authentication (MFA) on all privileged and externally accessible accounts, and periodic access reviews.
- Phishing and Malware Exposure: Operational and field employees are high-value targets for phishing. Routine phishing-resistant controls — ongoing targeted awareness training, simulated phishing programs, and enforced email authentication (SPF/DKIM/DMARC) — reduce successful compromises. Endpoint protection with modern EDR and application allowlisting should be deployed on service laptops and shop computers.
- Network and Segmentation Weaknesses: Dealer facilities typically host Wi‑Fi for customers and separate technician networks. Without strict segmentation and firewall policies, guest or shop traffic can reach corporate systems. Implement network segmentation, enforce zero-trust principles between production and office networks, and ensure secure remote access (VPNs with MFA or better, such as client certificates).
- Website/Portal TLS and Configuration Issues: Any customer-facing portal or parts catalog must enforce modern TLS configurations and HSTS, and use up-to-date libraries and CMS components. Regular automated scanning for SSL/TLS misconfigurations, vulnerable dependencies, and improper CORS/headers is essential.
- Third-Party and Telematics Risk: Integrations with telematics providers, rental platforms, or finance partners introduce supply-chain exposure. Maintain an inventory of third-party services, contractual security requirements, and periodic third-party assessments or attestations (SOC 2, ISO 27001 where appropriate).
- Incident Detection and Response: Smaller operators may lack centralized logging and detection. Implement centralized log collection (SIEM or managed detection), establish baseline metrics (auth failures, unusual data egress, privileged activity), and develop an incident response playbook with tabletop exercises. Ensure immutable backups for critical systems and tested recovery procedures.
Recommended immediate actions (first 90 days)
1. Conduct an external security assessment: vulnerability scan, web application test, and basic penetration test targeting employee-facing systems.
2. Immediately enforce MFA across all critical accounts and external access points.
3. Rotate and remediate any known compromised or reused credentials; deploy a corporate password manager and mandate password hygiene.
4. Patch management sprint: remediate critical OS, application, and TLS issues on public-facing assets.
5. Deploy or enhance endpoint detection and response on employee and service devices.
6. Implement logging centralization and engage a managed detection provider if in-house capability is limited.
7. Review third-party contracts and require minimal security baselines for vendors handling PII or telematics.
Financial, reputational, and privacy considerations
A breach affecting customer billing, payroll, or operational telematics can inflict immediate financial remediation costs, regulatory notifications, and long-term reputational damage that reduces fleet and parts sales. Data exposures can also implicate customers’ project confidentiality and raise liability for lost competitive advantage. Prioritizing detection, limiting blast radius through segmentation, and ensuring quick recovery capability are cost-effective ways to reduce these downstream impacts.
Conclusion: Is Riggs Cat Safe?
Riggs Cat has no documented public breaches in the provided description, but its operational profile exposes it to common dealer-sector threats: credential compromise, phishing, misconfigured public services, and third‑party risk. Immediate priorities are MFA, vulnerability remediation, credential hygiene, network segmentation, and a tested incident response. These steps materially reduce financial, privacy, and reputational risk while enabling sustainable security maturity.
Details
Website:
Industries:
Artificial Intelligence
Company size:
201-500 employees
Founded:
1927
Headquarters:
9125 Interstate-30; Little Rock, Arkansas 72209, US
Outcome reliability
We analyze billions of signals from publicly available sources to deliver validated insights into how your company is perceived externally by threat actors. These insights help security teams respond more quickly to risks, manage zero-day incidents effectively, and reduce overall exposure.