Get report
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Is Quick Transformation safe?

Quick Transformation risk score

Get detailed report
f

55/100

overall score

Total issues found:

81
Updated on: December 3, 2025
Data we analyse
Phishing and malware
68 issues

Network security
1 issue

Email security
2 issues

Website security
10 issues
Recent critical risk issues we found
104 corporate credentials stolen
69% employees reuse breached passwords
2 domains vulnerable to email spoofing
10 SSL configuration issues found
What information we check
Software patching
Web application security
Email security
Dark web exposure
Cybersecurity Benchmark
A comparison of this company’s cybersecurity ranking with industry averages and peer organizations
Phishing and malware
0 vs. 50

Network security
90 vs. 89

Email security
0 vs. 52

Website security
70 vs. 68
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Company overview
I’m ready to produce the requested 700-word security report specifically for QUICK ERP, but I don’t have the description or the evaluation data you referenced (the prompt’s “Description:” field is empty). I need that input to integrate your facts and scores accurately.

Please choose one of the options below so I can proceed:

1) Provide the missing description and any evaluation data (e.g., breach history, recent incident details, SerityData-like scores/issues). I will produce a 700-word report strictly based on that material.

2) If you don’t have a prepared description, I can draft a reasoned, hypothetical 700-word security assessment for QUICK ERP based on common ERP and fintech security patterns (internal-exposure risks, SSL/website issues, phishing, credential reuse, regulatory exposure). I will clearly label it as a hypothetical assessment and avoid asserting any real-world breaches.

Which would you prefer? If option 1, paste the description and any evaluation figures. If option 2, confirm and I’ll produce the draft immediately.
Details
Industries:
Artificial Intelligence
Company size:
51-200 employees
Founded:
2007
Headquarters:
5 Soi Hua Mak 9; Hua Mak, Bangkok City 10240, TH

Outcome reliability

We analyze billions of signals from publicly available sources to deliver validated insights into how your company is perceived externally by threat actors. These insights help security teams respond more quickly to risks, manage zero-day incidents effectively, and reduce overall exposure.

This is an inline graph showing outcome reliability scores. The grades are as follows: F is between 0 and 70, D is between 70 and 78, C is between 79 and 85, B is between 85 and 95, and A is above 95.