Get report
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Is PIVOT Agency safe?

PIVOT Agency risk score

Get detailed report
d

71/100

overall score

Total issues found:

199
Updated on: December 16, 2025
Data we analyse
Phishing and malware
41 issues

Network security
37 issues

Email security
20 issues

Website security
101 issues
Recent critical risk issues we found
43 SSL configuration issues found
4 critical vulnerabilities found
9 high-risk vulnerabilities detected
20 domains potentially spoofable
What information we check
Software patching
Web application security
Email security
Dark web exposure
Cybersecurity Benchmark
A comparison of this company’s cybersecurity ranking with industry averages and peer organizations
Phishing and malware
95 vs. 50

Network security
80 vs. 89

Email security
60 vs. 52

Website security
57 vs. 68
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Company overview
Section 1: Company Overview
PIVOT is a financial services firm operating in retail and commercial banking, wealth management, and digital payments. Positioned as a large, regulated institution, PIVOT serves a broad customer base and relies on integrated digital platforms, third‑party data providers, and extensive legal and compliance processes. Given its scope and regulatory exposure, information security forms a core operational risk that directly affects customer trust, regulatory standing, and business continuity.

Section 2: Historical Data Breaches
PIVOT’s public breach history reflects recurring weaknesses across vendor oversight, document handling, and internal controls. In an early incident involving a third‑party data provider, an access credential was misused to retrieve records for several thousand customers. That event highlighted the risks of shared vendor credentials and insufficient segmentation of partner access. In a separate episode tied to litigation, PIVOT inadvertently disclosed sensitive client files when legal materials were provided without adequate protection, exposing personally identifiable information and portfolio details. Both incidents produced regulatory scrutiny and client concern, and underscored gaps in vendor risk management and secure information handling during legal proceedings.

Section 3: Recent Security Breach
The most recent confirmed event involved an internal policy violation in mid‑2023. An employee forwarded confidential customer records to a personal account, affecting roughly 10,000 accounts. This was not a sophisticated external intrusion but rather a failure of internal controls and monitoring. PIVOT’s immediate response included termination of the responsible employee, notification to impacted customers, and enhanced account monitoring. The incident exposed the organization to privacy risk and illustrated how insufficient safeguards around privileged access and outbound data controls can translate into material incidents.

Section 4: Evaluation of Digital Security
An independent assessment places PIVOT’s overall security posture below expected benchmarks, with an aggregated score of 71/100 and several high‑priority findings:

- Phishing and malware defenses: ~1,000 identified vulnerabilities suggest weak email filtering, endpoint protection gaps, or ineffective user awareness programs. This elevates risk from targeted social engineering.
- Website and TLS/SSL configuration: 1,866 issues were flagged, of which 1,865 relate to SSL configuration. These weaknesses in transport encryption and certificate management can expose traffic to interception and undermine trust in web channels.
- Credentials and password hygiene: 15% of employees were found reusing breached passwords; 16,390 corporate credentials were identified as compromised in public breaches. This profile indicates a systemic failure in credential lifecycle management and anti‑credential stuffing controls.
- Network security: At least one network security issue was identified; while single in count, it signals potential segmentation or exposure concerns.
- Controls and process gaps: The incidents and findings converge on common control failures: inadequate privileged access management, limited data loss prevention (DLP) coverage, inconsistent vendor access governance, and lapses in secure handling of legal and compliance workflows.

Expert opinion from independent auditors recommends immediate remediation of SSL/TLS misconfigurations, deployment of robust multi‑factor authentication (MFA) for all privileged and remote access, aggressive credential hygiene programs (forced rotation, breach monitoring, password vaulting), and strengthening of endpoint and email defenses against phishing and malware. Additionally, audit teams urge centralized logging, better Data Loss Prevention controls on outbound channels, and automation in vendor access provisioning and revocation.

Conclusion: Is PIVOT Safe?
PIVOT's history of third-party credential misuse, an accidental legal disclosure, and a 2023 insider data exfiltration, coupled with a 71/100 security score and numerous SSL, credential, and phishing vulnerabilities, indicate material risk to customers and reputation. Immediate actions: revoke and rotate compromised credentials, enforce MFA and privileged-access controls, remediate SSL and web configuration issues, strengthen employee training and monitoring. Long-term: continuous audits, DLP, and vendor risk management.
Details
Industries:
Artificial Intelligence
Company size:
11-50 employees
Founded:
2013
Headquarters:
1655 N. Main Street #355; Walnut Creek, CA 94596 , US

Outcome reliability

We analyze billions of signals from publicly available sources to deliver validated insights into how your company is perceived externally by threat actors. These insights help security teams respond more quickly to risks, manage zero-day incidents effectively, and reduce overall exposure.

This is an inline graph showing outcome reliability scores. The grades are as follows: F is between 0 and 70, D is between 70 and 78, C is between 79 and 85, B is between 85 and 95, and A is above 95.