Get report
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Is InsideSales.com safe?

InsideSales.com risk score

Get detailed report
f

55/100

overall score

Total issues found:

5777
Updated on: December 29, 2025
Data we analyse
Phishing and malware
5634 issues

Network security
1 issue

Email security
35 issues

Website security
107 issues
Recent critical risk issues we found
285 corporate credentials stolen
35 domains vulnerable to email spoofing
96 SSL configuration issues found
What information we check
Software patching
Web application security
Email security
Dark web exposure
Cybersecurity Benchmark
A comparison of this company’s cybersecurity ranking with industry averages and peer organizations
Phishing and malware
0 vs. 50

Network security
100 vs. 89

Email security
0 vs. 52

Website security
59 vs. 68
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Company overview
Section 1: Company Overview
InsideSales is a B2B software provider focused on sales engagement and revenue acceleration tools, delivering cloud-based platforms and AI-driven analytics to help commercial teams scale outbound and inbound selling. As a SaaS vendor operating across regulated and enterprise markets, InsideSales handles sensitive customer and prospect data, integrates with CRM and communication systems, and relies on secure uptime and data confidentiality to maintain client trust and regulatory compliance. Its operational profile makes information security a core business requirement.

Section 2: Historical Data Breaches
In the materials supplied for this analysis there are no company-specific, publicly disclosed data breaches tied to InsideSales. That absence of reported incidents is a positive signal but should not be construed as definitive proof of an effective security posture. In comparable SaaS and sales-technology companies, the most common historical failure modes are: inadvertent disclosures during legal or customer-support workflows, credential compromise leading to unauthorized access, misconfigured web or API endpoints exposing data, and insider misuse. Given InsideSales’s role as a data processor for customers’ sales records and contact lists, these categories represent the principal historical risks to monitor.

Section 3: Recent Security Breach
(omitted — no recent breach information provided)
No recent breach details were supplied. Accordingly, this section is omitted per the assessment guidance.

Section 4: Evaluation of Digital Security
No formal third-party security audit data specific to InsideSales was supplied with the description. In place of vendor-provided metrics, this evaluation focuses on the typical control set required for a secure SaaS sales platform and identifies likely areas of attention based on industry best practices.

- Access and Identity Management: For a sales-engagement platform, strong identity controls are essential. Multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all administrative and customer-facing accounts, single sign-on (SSO) integration with enterprise identity providers, and strict least-privilege role definitions are foundational. Particular emphasis should be placed on detecting and mitigating credential reuse and managing API keys and service credentials.

- Application and Web Security: The public-facing components (apps, portals, APIs) should be hardened against common web threats (OWASP Top 10). Proper TLS/SSL configuration, up-to-date libraries and runtime environments, and regular application security testing (SAST/DAST) reduce surface area. Attention to certificate management and secure CORS/CSP policies is important to prevent interception or cross-origin attacks.

- Incident Detection and Response: Continuous logging, centralized SIEM or logging platform, and clearly documented incident response playbooks enable rapid containment. Endpoint detection for employees and privileged-user monitoring can limit insider-driven exfiltration risks.

- Data Protection: Encryption of data at rest and in transit, robust key management practices, data minimization, and precise data retention policies are necessary given the volume of personally identifiable information (PII) and business intelligence processed. Controls to manage exports, legal disclosures, and secure sharing are essential to prevent accidental exposure.

- Third-Party and Supply Chain Risk: Integrations with CRMs, telephony providers, and marketing stacks create dependencies. A formal vendor risk management program, contractual security requirements, and periodic assessments of critical suppliers are advisable.

- Human Factors: Phishing resistance training, simulated testing, strict BYOD policies, and privileged access reviews reduce the chance that social engineering or careless behavior will yield a breach.

Recommended immediate technical actions (if not already in place)
- Execute an external penetration test and remediate high/critical findings within defined SLAs.
- Obtain an independent SOC 2 Type II or equivalent audit if not current.
- Enforce organization-wide MFA and rotate/limit long-lived credentials and API keys.
- Deploy automated scanning for exposed credentials and compromised logins; require password hygiene policies and implement risk-based authentication.
- Harden TLS/SSL configurations and remediate any weak cipher suites or certificate issues.
- Review and test incident response and legal-disclosure workflows to prevent accidental document disclosures.

Conclusion: Is InsideSales Safe?
InsideSales has no company-specific public breach disclosures in the provided material, but absence of reports does not equal immunity. The platform’s safety hinges on robust SaaS controls: MFA and centralized credential governance, hardened web/SSL configurations, application security testing, continuous monitoring, and disciplined third‑party oversight. Immediate priorities are independent security testing, elimination of credential reuse, prioritized remediation of critical findings, and strengthened insider access controls to limit financial, reputational, and privacy exposures.

Summary (500–600 characters)
InsideSales has no company-specific public breach disclosures in the supplied materials, but absence of reports does not equal secure posture. Risk depends on strong SaaS security controls: multi-factor authentication, centralized credential management to eliminate reuse, hardened web/SSL configurations, phishing-resistant training, and continuous monitoring. Immediate steps: independent security assessment, prioritized remediation, and stricter insider controls. Failure to act would expose customer data, revenue and reputation to material risk.
Details
Industries:
Artificial Intelligence
Company size:
501-1000 employees
Founded:
2012
Headquarters:
Austin, TX 78701, US

Outcome reliability

We analyze billions of signals from publicly available sources to deliver validated insights into how your company is perceived externally by threat actors. These insights help security teams respond more quickly to risks, manage zero-day incidents effectively, and reduce overall exposure.

This is an inline graph showing outcome reliability scores. The grades are as follows: F is between 0 and 70, D is between 70 and 78, C is between 79 and 85, B is between 85 and 95, and A is above 95.