Get report
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Is IMS, Inc. safe?

IMS, Inc. risk score

Get detailed report
d

71/100

overall score

Total issues found:

640
Updated on: December 29, 2025
Data we analyse
Phishing and malware
599 issues

Network security
1 issue

Email security
0 issues

Website security
40 issues
Recent critical risk issues we found
47 corporate credentials stolen
40 SSL configuration issues found
Only 46% of systems cloud-hosted
What information we check
Software patching
Web application security
Email security
Dark web exposure
Cybersecurity Benchmark
A comparison of this company’s cybersecurity ranking with industry averages and peer organizations
Phishing and malware
0 vs. 50

Network security
100 vs. 89

Email security
100 vs. 52

Website security
61 vs. 68
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Company overview
Section 1: Company Overview
Immediate Mailing Services is a commercial provider of mailing, document-handling, and customer-communication solutions for businesses and institutions. Operating in a regulated environment where personal and financial data are routinely processed, the company’s scale—serving thousands of business clients and large customer lists—makes information security a core operational requirement. This report is based solely on the supplied description and should be validated with primary sources before external use.

Section 2: Historical Data Breaches
The supplied material indicates Immediate Mailing Services has experienced multiple notable incidents that exposed customer data over time. An early incident mirrored a third‑party data-access compromise in which an external bureau credential was misused to obtain information on several thousand consumers, later refined to a smaller affected cohort. A separate event involved an unsecured legal disclosure: a voluminous set of client documents (on the order of gigabytes) was produced during litigation without appropriate protections, releasing names, identification numbers, account details and advisor notes. Collectively these incidents reveal recurring gaps in third‑party credential management, legal process controls, and document-handling protocols, elevating the risk of identity theft and regulatory penalties.

Section 3: Recent Security Breach
Most recently, in mid‑2023, Immediate Mailing Services suffered an internally caused breach when an employee sent confidential customer records to a personal account, exposing roughly 10,000 customer records. The breach was reported as stemming from failure to follow established policy rather than an external intrusion. The company’s immediate response reportedly included termination of the responsible staff member, notification to affected clients, and enhanced account monitoring. While decisive personnel action and customer outreach are necessary first steps, this incident underscores weaknesses in internal controls, privileged access restrictions, and data-loss prevention mechanisms.

Section 4: Evaluation of Digital Security
A consolidated security assessment provided in the description indicates Immediate Mailing Services’ security posture sits below recommended benchmarks with a score of 71/100. Key technical findings include large numbers of web and SSL configuration issues (approximately 1,866 website-related items, almost all tied to SSL misconfigurations), around 1,000 identified gaps in phishing and malware defenses, and one flagged network security concern. On identity and credential hygiene, the assessment found widespread exposure: roughly 16,390 corporate credentials identified as compromised and 15% of employees reusing passwords known from prior breaches. These findings point to systemic issues across multiple layers:

- Perimeter and application security: Extensive SSL misconfiguration implies weak encryption posture for data in transit and potential susceptibility to man‑in‑the‑middle and interception attacks. Website and component vulnerabilities increase attack surface for web-based exploitation.

- Endpoint and email threats: High counts of phishing/malware gaps suggest insufficient email defenses, endpoint detection, or user training—consistent with insider-driven data exfiltration risk.

- Identity and access management (IAM): Large volume of known-compromised credentials and password reuse indicate inadequate credential hygiene, insufficient multi‑factor authentication (MFA) coverage, lack of password rotation, and weak detection of credential stuffing or brute-force attempts.

- Control environment and data handling: Prior legal-document disclosures and internal policy violations expose failures in secure document workflows, least‑privilege access, and audit trails required to detect misuse.

Where available, expert opinion embedded in the assessment recommends immediate remediation of SSL and web configuration issues, a focused credential remediation campaign, and strengthening of internal procedures. No external penetration-test reports are cited in the supplied material; an independent audit would be advisable for objective verification.

Conclusion: Is Immediate Mailing Services Safe?
Immediate Mailing Services currently exhibits a risk profile that warrants urgent remediation. Historical accidental disclosures and a 2023 insider exfiltration, combined with an overall security score of 71/100 and thousands of SSL and credential issues, create material exposure to financial, regulatory, and reputational harm. Immediate actions should include containing active exposures, rotating and blocking compromised credentials, enforcing company‑wide MFA, patching and remediating SSL/website misconfigurations, deploying DLP and improved email/endpoint protection, and conducting an independent security audit. Parallel initiatives—regulatory notification assessments, enhanced vendor and legal-document controls, targeted employee training, and adoption of least‑privilege IAM—are essential to reduce recurrence and restore stakeholder confidence.

Note: This analysis is synthesized from the description you provided and should be corroborated with primary evidence and internal incident reports before operational or public action.
Details
Industries:
Artificial Intelligence
Company size:
201-500 employees
Founded:
1986
Headquarters:
245 Commerce Blvd; Liverpool, NY 13088, US

Outcome reliability

We analyze billions of signals from publicly available sources to deliver validated insights into how your company is perceived externally by threat actors. These insights help security teams respond more quickly to risks, manage zero-day incidents effectively, and reduce overall exposure.

This is an inline graph showing outcome reliability scores. The grades are as follows: F is between 0 and 70, D is between 70 and 78, C is between 79 and 85, B is between 85 and 95, and A is above 95.