Get report
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Is Hydsoft CO., LTD safe?

Hydsoft CO., LTD risk score

Get detailed report
d

79/100

overall score

Total issues found:

109
Updated on: December 29, 2025
Data we analyse
Phishing and malware
85 issues

Network security
1 issue

Email security
1 issue

Website security
22 issues
Recent critical risk issues we found
17 SSL configuration issues found
147 corporate credentials stolen
Recent data breach: 21 days ago
32% employees reuse breached passwords
What information we check
Software patching
Web application security
Email security
Dark web exposure
Cybersecurity Benchmark
A comparison of this company’s cybersecurity ranking with industry averages and peer organizations
Phishing and malware
41 vs. 50

Network security
96 vs. 89

Email security
92 vs. 52

Website security
54 vs. 68
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Company overview
Section 1: Company Overview
Hydsoft Technology is a mid-to-large technology firm specializing in financial software and data-integration services for banks, lenders, and fintech clients. The company provides account aggregation, transaction enrichment, and compliance tooling, operating in a heavily regulated ecosystem where confidentiality, integrity, and availability of customer data are central to business continuity and trust. Hydsoft’s workforce, partner network, and cloud-hosted infrastructure create a broad attack surface that requires disciplined security controls and vendor governance.

Section 2: Historical Data Breaches
Based on the provided dossier, Hydsoft’s historical incidents mirror several common industry failure modes. One early event involved misuse of a third‑party access credential that permitted unauthorized retrieval of consumer records, exposing names and other personal identifiers. Another notable episode resembled an inadvertent legal disclosure: a large batch of sensitive customer files was produced without sufficient protection during litigation support, resulting in disclosure of personally identifiable information and financial details. These incidents demonstrate recurring gaps in third‑party oversight, data handling procedures, and legal‑process controls.

Section 3: Recent Security Breach
A more recent breach in mid-2023 was attributed to an internal control failure rather than an external exploit: an employee forwarded confidential customer data to a personal account, impacting roughly 10,000 customer records. The event underscores the risk from insider threats, insufficient enforcement of data-loss prevention (DLP) policies, and incomplete monitoring of privileged actions. Hydsoft’s immediate remediation reportedly included termination of the responsible staff member, customer notifications, and heightened account monitoring, but the episode indicates the need for systemic, not solely disciplinary, remedies.

Section 4: Evaluation of Digital Security
An independent assessment of Hydsoft’s digital posture exposes material weaknesses and below-benchmark performance. Key findings drawn from the evaluation include:
- Phishing and malware defenses: a large number of exploitable gaps were identified, demonstrating insufficient email and endpoint protections and inadequate anti-phishing controls.
- Network security: at least one substantive network configuration issue was highlighted, suggesting potential lateral-movement or exposure risk.
- Web and TLS posture: a high volume of website security problems were detected, dominated by flawed SSL/TLS configurations that increase the risk of interception and downgrade attacks.
- Credential hygiene: a nontrivial portion of staff were found to reuse breached passwords, and many corporate credentials were discovered in external leaks, increasing account takeover probability.
- Overall score: the assessment places Hydsoft below the recommended benchmark (a mid-70s/100 or lower relative assessment), indicating significant remediation work is required.

Audit and expert commentary in the dossier emphasize that these issues are interdependent: poor SSL/TLS hygiene enables man-in-the-middle attacks, credential reuse facilitates account compromise, and phishing gaps exploit the same human vulnerabilities that allowed the 2023 insider exfiltration. The assessment also flagged vendor and legal‑process controls as recurring governance weaknesses.

Conclusion: Is Hydsoft Technology Safe?
Hydsoft Technology exhibits elevated security risk. Historical third‑party credential misuse, an accidental legal disclosure, and a 2023 insider data leak—combined with an assessment showing widespread SSL misconfigurations, phishing/malware gaps, extensive credential compromise, and numerous website faults—indicate systemic control weaknesses. Immediate remediation must prioritize containment, full credential revocation and rotation, mandatory multi-factor authentication, accelerated patching of TLS/web components, a forensic investigation, strengthened DLP, targeted employee security training, and rigorous third‑party audits to reduce financial, reputational, and privacy exposure.

Immediate recommended actions (short list)
- Contain: suspend impacted accounts, isolate affected systems, and commence forensic investigation.
- Credentials: revoke exposed credentials, enforce password reset and mandatory MFA, and deploy credential monitoring.
- Technical fixes: remediate SSL/TLS misconfigurations, apply critical patches, and harden web application stacks.
- Human controls: implement DLP, restrict risky outbound channels, and roll out targeted anti-phishing and data‑handling training.
- Governance: perform vendor security assessments, update legal‑process protocols for protected disclosures, and schedule periodic external audits.

Longer-term measures
- Adopt a risk-based vulnerability management program with continuous scanning and prioritized remediation.
- Integrate least-privilege access, centralized logging, and behavioral analytics to detect insider anomalies.
- Establish a mature incident response plan with tabletop exercises and regulatory-compliant notification processes.
- Invest in encryption-at-rest and in-transit, automated secrets management, and a formal third‑party risk management program.
Details
Industries:
Artificial Intelligence
Company size:
1001-5000 employees
Founded:
2009
Headquarters:
Beijing, CN

Outcome reliability

We analyze billions of signals from publicly available sources to deliver validated insights into how your company is perceived externally by threat actors. These insights help security teams respond more quickly to risks, manage zero-day incidents effectively, and reduce overall exposure.

This is an inline graph showing outcome reliability scores. The grades are as follows: F is between 0 and 70, D is between 70 and 78, C is between 79 and 85, B is between 85 and 95, and A is above 95.