Get report
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Is 杭州宇谷科技有限公司 safe?

杭州宇谷科技有限公司 risk score

Get detailed report
f

57/100

overall score

Total issues found:

1876
Updated on: December 2, 2025
Data we analyse
Phishing and malware
0 issues

Network security
1499 issues

Email security
63 issues

Website security
314 issues
Recent critical risk issues we found
63 domains vulnerable to email spoofing
149 critical vulnerabilities found
239 high-risk vulnerabilities detected
304 SSL configuration issues found
What information we check
Software patching
Web application security
Email security
Dark web exposure
Cybersecurity Benchmark
A comparison of this company’s cybersecurity ranking with industry averages and peer organizations
Phishing and malware
100 vs. 50

Network security
65 vs. 89

Email security
0 vs. 52

Website security
66 vs. 68
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Company overview
Section 1: Company Overview
Yugu Technology is a fintech-focused technology firm that provides financial data connectivity, account aggregation, and integration services to banks, lenders, and third-party financial applications. Operating in a regulated ecosystem, Yugu serves corporate clients that depend on secure transmission and processing of sensitive financial information. While not a traditional bank, Yugu’s role as a data intermediary places it under strong regulatory and contractual obligations to protect consumer financial data and to maintain robust operational controls.

Section 2: Historical Data Breaches
Yugu’s public security history shows several notable incidents that expose recurring themes of third‑party risk, inadequate handling of sensitive files, and insider control weaknesses. In one early incident, credentials tied to a third‑party credit or data provider were misused to retrieve information on several thousand consumers; follow‑up narrowed the impact to roughly 5,000 affected records and the company escalated the matter to law enforcement. A separate disclosure occurred during litigation when a submission of client documents lacked sufficient redaction and protective controls, producing an unintended release of sensitive customer identifiers and financial details. These events demonstrated gaps in legal/data governance processes and controls around file handling and access.

Section 3: Recent Security Breach
In June 2023, Yugu experienced an internally originated breach in which an employee transmitted confidential customer files to a personal account. Approximately 10,000 customer records were involved. The incident was characterized as an internal control failure rather than an external cyberattack. Yugu’s immediate response included terminating the responsible individual, notifying affected customers, instituting account monitoring, and revising internal procedures to limit outbound data movement. While these steps are appropriate as incident containment, they also underscore the need for stronger preventive measures to reduce reliance on reactive personnel actions.

Section 4: Evaluation of Digital Security
A comprehensive external assessment of Yugu’s digital security produced a middling overall score (71/100) and highlighted multiple high‑priority weaknesses:

- Phishing and malware posture: The assessment identified roughly 1,000 vulnerabilities across user and endpoint defenses that could be exploited through social engineering and malicious software. This suggests phishing-resistant controls, endpoint detection, and patch hygiene need reinforcement.

- Website and transport encryption: Approximately 1,866 issues were noted on externally facing web infrastructure; nearly all were tied to SSL/TLS configuration shortcomings. Weak or misconfigured TLS can expose data in transit to interception or downgrade attacks and undermines trust in API and browser communications.

- Network security: A limited but meaningful network control issue was found, indicating opportunities to harden segmentation, firewall rules, and monitoring to limit lateral movement and contain incidents.

- Credential hygiene: The report found that 15% of employees reused credentials previously exposed in other breaches, and an inventory discovered 16,390 corporate credentials that were compromised or circulating. This is a critical systemic risk: credential reuse and leaked credentials remain the leading vector for account takeover.

- Governance and controls: Prior incidents and the assessment point to gaps in data handling policies (particularly for legal and compliance workflows), as well as immature DLP (data loss prevention), privileged access management, and insider threat detection capabilities.

Audit and expert commentary included recommendations to adopt multifactor authentication universally, accelerate remediation of TLS/SSL configurations, implement enterprise password/credential management with enforced rotation, deploy robust DLP controls on data egress channels, and enhance phishing simulation and user awareness programs. Penetration testing and continuous external monitoring were recommended to validate fixes and reduce the attack surface.

Conclusion: Is Yugu Technology Safe?
Yugu Technology maintains core operational controls but its security posture exhibits significant weaknesses that elevate risk to customers and partners. Historical accidental disclosures, a large insider‑caused incident, and an external assessment revealing numerous SSL misconfigurations, extensive credential exposure, and substantial phishing/malware vulnerabilities indicate that Yugu is not fully secure. Immediate priorities should be: enforce organization‑wide multifactor authentication; remediate all TLS/SSL misconfigurations; deploy an enterprise credential vault and eliminate credential reuse; implement DLP and strict outbound data controls; and roll out mandatory, role‑specific security training plus continuous phishing testing. Addressing these areas will reduce financial, reputational, and privacy exposures and align the company with regulatory expectations.
Details
Industries:
Artificial Intelligence
Company size:
-
Founded:
-
Headquarters:
浙江省杭州市余杭区良渚街道七贤路1号1幢6楼603室; 杭州市, 浙江省 310030, CN

Outcome reliability

We analyze billions of signals from publicly available sources to deliver validated insights into how your company is perceived externally by threat actors. These insights help security teams respond more quickly to risks, manage zero-day incidents effectively, and reduce overall exposure.

This is an inline graph showing outcome reliability scores. The grades are as follows: F is between 0 and 70, D is between 70 and 78, C is between 79 and 85, B is between 85 and 95, and A is above 95.