Get report
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Is DeepBlue Technology safe?

DeepBlue Technology risk score

Get detailed report
f

42/100

overall score

Total issues found:

919
Updated on: December 16, 2025
Data we analyse
Phishing and malware
74 issues

Network security
765 issues

Email security
21 issues

Website security
59 issues
Recent critical risk issues we found
21 domains vulnerable to email spoofing
75 critical vulnerabilities found
113 high-risk vulnerabilities detected
58 SSL configuration issues found
What information we check
Software patching
Web application security
Email security
Dark web exposure
Cybersecurity Benchmark
A comparison of this company’s cybersecurity ranking with industry averages and peer organizations
Phishing and malware
58 vs. 50

Network security
64 vs. 89

Email security
0 vs. 52

Website security
59 vs. 68
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Company overview
Section 1: Company Overview
DeepBlue Technology is a mid-to-large technology firm focused on advanced software and data-driven services. Operating across enterprise software, cloud services, and data analytics, the company serves corporate and consumer clients globally. DeepBlue’s scale and mix of proprietary data processing make regulatory compliance and information security critical to its business continuity and reputation. Its technology stack and third-party integrations create an expanded attack surface requiring mature governance and operational security controls.

Section 2: Historical Data Breaches
DeepBlue has experienced multiple incidents that exposed gaps in its information risk program. An early third-party supplier incident led to unauthorized access to a limited set of consumer records; an access credential issued to a partner was misused to collect several thousand customer records before detection. In a later legal process, an inadequately protected legal disclosure resulted in the unintended release of sensitive client files, including personally identifiable information and contract details. These episodes highlighted weaknesses in vendor oversight, data handling procedures, and secure document management during litigation. The company’s responses typically included notification to affected parties, engagement with law enforcement or regulators when necessary, and remediation measures—yet recurring patterns suggest structural issues in internal controls.

Section 3: Recent Security Breach
Most recently, an insider-related incident compromised approximately 10,000 customer accounts when an employee exported confidential records to a personal account in violation of policy. This was not a sophisticated external intrusion but an internal controls failure—insufficient policy enforcement, inadequate monitoring of data exfiltration channels, and gaps in role-based access controls. DeepBlue terminated the employee, informed impacted customers, and initiated account monitoring and remediation. The breach demonstrates that technical defenses alone are insufficient without consistent procedural enforcement, least-privilege access, and real-time detection of anomalous insider behavior.

Section 4: Evaluation of Digital Security
A third-party security assessment rated DeepBlue’s overall cyber posture below recommended benchmarks and identified a mix of configuration and operational vulnerabilities:

- Phishing and Malware: The evaluation found a large number of weak points in phishing resilience and endpoint malware defenses, indicating high susceptibility to credential harvesting and successful initial compromise.
- Network Security: A discrete network-control weakness was flagged; while not immediately catastrophic, it represents an exploitable misconfiguration if combined with other attack vectors.
- Website and TLS Configuration: Extensive website configuration issues were identified, dominated by TLS/SSL misconfigurations that weaken encryption in transit and could permit interception or downgrade attacks.
- Credentials and Password Management: A concerning percentage of staff were found to be reusing compromised passwords, and thousands of corporate credentials appear to have been exposed in external data leaks—evidence of inadequate credential hygiene and insufficient use of privileged access management.
- Metrics and Score: The aggregate security score placed DeepBlue substantially below top-tier benchmarks, signaling material exposure.

Independent expert commentary emphasizes that many of the flagged issues are operational and configuration-based—remediable but requiring prioritized programmatic response. Auditors recommended immediate hardening of TLS settings, adoption of enterprise password/credential management with multi-factor enforcement, rollout of robust anti-phishing training and controls, and implementation of data-loss prevention (DLP) tooling with behavior analytics to detect insider exfiltration.

Conclusion: Is DeepBlue Technology Safe?
DeepBlue Technology faces notable security weaknesses. Historical and recent incidents reveal recurring control failures—third-party credential misuse, unsecured legal disclosures, and insider-driven data exfiltration—compounded by widespread configuration issues (notably TLS/SSL), insufficient phishing/malware defenses, and a large set of compromised corporate credentials. While not yet indicating systemic compromise of core infrastructure, the risk of financial, regulatory, and reputational harm is material. Immediate priorities are to: (1) remediate critical TLS and website configuration flaws; (2) enforce enterprise-wide multi-factor authentication and password hygiene via PAM/SSO; (3) deploy DLP and user behavior analytics to detect insider threats; (4) strengthen vendor security controls and legal processing workflows; and (5) conduct an accelerated incident-response tabletop and technical retest. These steps will reduce exposure and demonstrate to stakeholders that DeepBlue is shifting from reactive remediation to sustained, measurable security improvement.
Details
Industries:
Artificial Intelligence
Company size:
501-1000 employees
Founded:
2014
Headquarters:
上海市长宁区威宁路369号; 369号; 上海市, 上海市 200336, CN

Outcome reliability

We analyze billions of signals from publicly available sources to deliver validated insights into how your company is perceived externally by threat actors. These insights help security teams respond more quickly to risks, manage zero-day incidents effectively, and reduce overall exposure.

This is an inline graph showing outcome reliability scores. The grades are as follows: F is between 0 and 70, D is between 70 and 78, C is between 79 and 85, B is between 85 and 95, and A is above 95.