47/100
overall score
Total issues found:
123Updated on: December 16, 2025
Data we analyse
Phishing and malware
70
issues
Network security
28
issues
Email security
8
issues
Website security
17
issues
Recent critical risk issues we found
8 domains vulnerable to email spoofing
17 SSL configuration issues found
2 critical vulnerabilities found
16 high-risk vulnerabilities detected
What information we check
Software patching
Web application security
Email security
Dark web exposure
Cybersecurity Benchmark
A comparison of this company’s cybersecurity ranking with industry averages and peer organizations
Phishing and malware
73
vs.
50
Network security
62
vs.
89
Email security
0
vs.
52
Website security
55
vs.
68
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Company overview
Section 1: Company OverviewDamon is a large, diversified financial services firm operating across retail and commercial banking, lending, and wealth management. Headquartered in a major U.S. financial center, Damon serves millions of retail and institutional customers and interfaces with a broad ecosystem of fintech partners and third-party data providers. Its size and regulatory exposure mean that information security and privacy controls are foundational to its business continuity, customer trust, and compliance obligations.
Section 2: Historical Data Breaches
Damon’s security history shows multiple incidents that reflect both third-party risk and internal process failures. In an early incident, access provided to an external credit-information vendor was abused to retrieve consumer records, affecting several thousand customers; subsequent investigation narrowed the exposure and law enforcement was notified. In another episode tied to litigation discovery, a large set of confidential client files was produced without sufficient redaction or protective measures, leading to inadvertent disclosure of highly sensitive personal and financial data. These events illustrate recurring themes: supplier access control weaknesses and lapses in legal and disclosure procedures.
Section 3: Recent Security Breach
A 2023 internal-control failure at Damon resulted in the unauthorized disclosure of confidential customer records when an employee forwarded protected information to a personal account. Approximately 10,000 customer accounts were implicated. Damon’s immediate response included termination of the employee, notification of affected customers, account monitoring, and revisions to internal policies. The incident was categorized as an insider error rather than an external intrusion, underscoring the operational risk posed by inadequate enforcement of data-handling rules and insufficient controls around outbound data flows.
Section 4: Evaluation of Digital Security
Independent assessments of Damon’s security posture reveal material gaps across multiple domains. Key findings include a substantial number of phishing and malware vulnerabilities, indicating that email and endpoint defenses require strengthening. A security scan identified numerous web-facing configuration issues—predominantly SSL/TLS misconfigurations—that elevate the risk of interception or man-in-the-middle exploitation on public channels. Network architecture reviews flagged at least one notable network control deficiency, which, while not necessarily critical in isolation, signals opportunities for improved segmentation and monitoring.
Credential hygiene is a prominent weakness: a significant percentage of staff were found to reuse passwords that had appeared in prior breaches, and tens of thousands of corporate credentials were discovered in aggregated compromise databases. This combination of poor password practices and exposed credentials materially increases the likelihood of account takeover and lateral movement in the environment.
Damon’s aggregated security score sits below common industry benchmarks, suggesting a remediation backlog and an elevated probability of future incidents. Where available, external expert commentary emphasizes the need for prioritized remediation of identity and access management, hardening of web-facing services (particularly TLS/SSL configuration and certificate lifecycle management), and enhancement of phishing resistance through technical controls and behavior change programs.
Comparative context: similar-sized fintech firms and digital banks often face overlapping risks—SSL misconfigurations, gaps in secure document handling, and insider threats. However, organizations that have reduced incident frequency typically combine robust vendor governance, continuous external scanning and pen-testing, and rigorous data-loss prevention (DLP) policies with automated enforcement.
Conclusion: Is Damon Safe?
Damon maintains foundational security programs but faces clear, actionable weaknesses that have already resulted in customer-impacting incidents. Past disclosures via third-party access and legal processes, the recent insider data leakage, and assessment findings—phishing/malware vulnerabilities, widespread SSL/TLS misconfigurations, and large numbers of compromised credentials—create a non-trivial risk to customer privacy, financial assets, and corporate reputation. Immediate priorities should be: enforce least-privilege access and multi-factor authentication for all administrative and remote access; deploy enterprise-wide DLP and outbound-mail controls; remediate critical SSL/TLS issues and harden web stacks; and execute an aggressive credential reset and phishing-resistance campaign combined with continuous monitoring and tabletop exercises. Financial exposure from regulatory fines and remediation costs, together with reputational damage, makes a rapid, prioritized security program both a business and compliance imperative.
Details
Website:
Industries:
Artificial Intelligence
Company size:
1001-5000 employees
Founded:
1997
Headquarters:
虹漕路; 461号; 上海市, 上海 200233, CN
Outcome reliability
We analyze billions of signals from publicly available sources to deliver validated insights into how your company is perceived externally by threat actors. These insights help security teams respond more quickly to risks, manage zero-day incidents effectively, and reduce overall exposure.