Get report
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Is CBNITS safe?

CBNITS risk score

Get detailed report
f

29/100

overall score

Total issues found:

529
Updated on: December 29, 2025
Data we analyse
Phishing and malware
465 issues

Network security
43 issues

Email security
2 issues

Website security
19 issues
Recent critical risk issues we found
2136 corporate credentials stolen
Recent data breach: 17 days ago
53% employees reuse breached passwords
5 critical vulnerabilities found
What information we check
Software patching
Web application security
Email security
Dark web exposure
Cybersecurity Benchmark
A comparison of this company’s cybersecurity ranking with industry averages and peer organizations
Phishing and malware
0 vs. 50

Network security
65 vs. 89

Email security
20 vs. 52

Website security
67 vs. 68
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Company overview
Section 1: Company Overview
CBNITS is presented as an information-technology and services provider focused on supporting financial institutions and related clients. Operating at the intersection of banking and technology, CBNITS delivers infrastructure, application support, and integration services that handle sensitive financial and personal customer information. Because its clients are regulated financial firms, CBNITS must meet high standards for confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The company’s risk profile reflects both its role as a custodian of data and the broad threat surface inherent in servicing multiple downstream institutions.

Section 2: Historical Data Breaches
There are no publicly documented, company-specific data breaches attributed to CBNITS in the materials provided. Absent confirmed incidents, risk assessments should nevertheless treat the organization as a high-value target given the sensitivity of the data it processes and the patterns observed across comparable firms in the financial and fintech sectors. Industry case studies show common failure modes—external vendor misconfiguration, internal mishandling of documents, and exposed credentials—that could be relevant to CBNITS unless proactively mitigated.

Section 3: Recent Security Breach
(omitted — no CBNITS-specific recent breach information was provided)

Section 4: Evaluation of Digital Security
A composite of sector assessments highlights recurring vulnerabilities that are directly relevant when evaluating CBNITS’s posture. Key risk vectors include:

- Insider risk and process controls: Recent incidents in comparable organizations were frequently tied to employee errors or policy non-compliance (e.g., sending confidential files to personal accounts or failing to protect discovery documents). This underscores the importance of strict data handling policies, automated DLP controls, and robust privileged-access governance for CBNITS.

- Credential hygiene and identity controls: In similar environments a meaningful share of corporate users were found reusing breached passwords and thousands of corporate credentials were present in exposure datasets. For CBNITS, inadequate password hygiene or lack of enterprise-wide multi-factor authentication (MFA) would represent a primary escalation path for attackers.

- SSL and web configuration: Evaluations of peer companies repeatedly surfaced high counts of SSL/TLS misconfigurations and website security weaknesses. Left unaddressed, these can expose data-in-transit, permit downgrade attacks, or enable man-in-the-middle activity. CBNITS should confirm TLS posture across all customer-facing APIs, portals, and integration endpoints.

- Phishing and malware susceptibility: Hundreds to thousands of phishing/malware vulnerabilities have been identified at large financial firms in industry reviews. The human element remains a critical attack vector; if CBNITS lacks continuous phishing simulation, anti-phishing tools, and endpoint protection with EDR capabilities, it will face elevated likelihood of compromise.

- Network and endpoint security: Even where only a small number of network issues were found in peer audits, those weaknesses often serve as initial footholds. Zero-trust segmentation, hardened perimeter controls, and continuous vulnerability management are necessary to reduce lateral movement and limit impact.

- Monitoring, detection, and incident response: Case histories show delays in detection or inadequate IR playbooks exacerbate harm after an event. CBNITS should maintain 24/7 security monitoring, fast escalation paths, and regularly exercised tabletop and live-response drills.

Audit and expert opinion recommendations (synthesized from sector evaluations)
- Conduct an external penetration test and a fresh application and infrastructure security review focused on TLS configurations, API endpoints, and web components.
- Perform a credential exposure sweep (external and dark‑web sources) and compel immediate rotation of compromised secrets.
- Enforce enterprise MFA, centralized password management, and least-privilege access with audited role-based controls.
- Implement Data Loss Prevention (DLP) on email and endpoint layers, and strengthen secure document exchange mechanisms (avoid unprotected email for sensitive customer submissions).
- Deploy continuous external attack-surface monitoring, automated SSL/TLS scanning, and prioritized patch management tied to business impact.
- Run regular phishing simulations and targeted user training; expand EDR coverage and tune detection rules for financial-data exfiltration patterns.

Conclusion: Is CBNITS Safe?
CBNITS has no publicly disclosed breaches, but analogous incidents in the financial and fintech sectors demonstrate clear exposure pathways—insider mishandling, SSL and web configuration weaknesses, compromised corporate credentials, and phishing/malware susceptibility. Immediate priorities: enforce MFA and least-privilege access, remediate SSL and website flaws, rotate and monitor any exposed credentials, deploy continuous external scanning and endpoint detection, run targeted phishing-resistant training, and exercise incident response plans. Prioritizing these measures within 30–90 days will materially reduce financial, reputational, and privacy risks.
Details
Industries:
Artificial Intelligence
Company size:
201-500 employees
Founded:
2018
Headquarters:
875 Yakima Drive; Fremont, California 94539, US

Outcome reliability

We analyze billions of signals from publicly available sources to deliver validated insights into how your company is perceived externally by threat actors. These insights help security teams respond more quickly to risks, manage zero-day incidents effectively, and reduce overall exposure.

This is an inline graph showing outcome reliability scores. The grades are as follows: F is between 0 and 70, D is between 70 and 78, C is between 79 and 85, B is between 85 and 95, and A is above 95.