Bloomingdale's risk score

I can produce the 700-word security report for Bloomingdales, but I need one clarification before proceeding: the prompt states “using the information provided in the following description,” but no description was included. I cannot responsibly invent specific breach details or quantitative findings (e.g., numbers of compromised credentials, or exact SSL counts) without that input or confirmed public sources.

Please choose one of the options below so I can continue:

1) Provide the intended description/evaluation data (the missing text). I will integrate it into a Bloomingdales-specific report and avoid verbatim copying.

2) Authorize me to use a neutral, fact‑conscious approach: I will produce a 700-word Bloomingdales report based on publicly known, high-level retail security risk patterns and generalized, non-specific findings (e.g., typical vectors: POS malware, supply‑chain, insider risk, phishing, web/SSL misconfigurations). I will avoid inventing specific incidents or numbers and will clearly flag any hypothetical or generalized statements.

3) If you want a report based on one of the previously provided company templates (Wells Fargo, Flinks, Openbank) adapted to Bloomingdales, confirm which dataset to adapt; I will clearly note that the underlying evaluation metrics are drawn from that dataset and will tailor the language to Bloomingdales.

Which option do you prefer? If you select option 1, please paste the description now and I will produce the full structured report.