Get report
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Is Aurelio AI safe?

Aurelio AI risk score

Get detailed report
d

76/100

overall score

Total issues found:

117
Updated on: December 29, 2025
Data we analyse
Phishing and malware
0 issues

Network security
5 issues

Email security
21 issues

Website security
91 issues
Recent critical risk issues we found
21 domains vulnerable to email spoofing
87 SSL configuration issues found
1 critical vulnerabilities found
1 high-risk vulnerabilities detected
What information we check
Software patching
Web application security
Email security
Dark web exposure
Cybersecurity Benchmark
A comparison of this company’s cybersecurity ranking with industry averages and peer organizations
Phishing and malware
100 vs. 50

Network security
91 vs. 89

Email security
0 vs. 52

Website security
66 vs. 68
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Company overview
Section 1: Company Overview
Aurelio AI (referred to here as “Aurelio AI”) is presented as a technology firm focused on artificial intelligence solutions. Specifics about its market segment, customer base, workforce size, or regulatory exposure were not provided. Given the nature of AI vendors, typical operational contexts include cloud-hosted services, APIs handling sensitive input data, and integrations with customer systems—conditions that elevate the importance of robust data governance, secure development practices, and third-party risk management.

Section 2: Historical Data Breaches
No company-specific, publicly disclosed historical breaches for Aurelio AI were supplied in the description. In the absence of documented incidents, an appropriate working assumption is that either no major disclosures have occurred or any events remain private. Nonetheless, comparable incidents in the financial and fintech sectors demonstrate recurring vectors that are relevant to Aurelio AI: accidental disclosure through legal processes, insider exfiltration of customer data, credential compromise, and misconfigured encryption. These industry precedents inform a cautious posture until verifiable audit records are available.

Section 3: Recent Security Breach
(omitted — no recent breach information provided)

Section 4: Evaluation of Digital Security
No formal SerityData or audit artifacts for Aurelio AI were included, so the evaluation below synthesizes risk signals commonly observed in technology and fintech vendors and translates them into concrete controls Aurelio AI should prioritize.

- Identity and Access Management (IAM): Credential compromise and password reuse are frequent contributors to breaches. Aurelio AI should enforce strong password policies, require multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all administrative and customer-accessible accounts, and apply least-privilege principles across services. Regular credential scanning against known breached-password lists will reduce exposure.

- Insider and Data Loss Controls: Insider negligence or malicious exfiltration—via personal email or removable media—can rapidly compromise customer data. Deploy Data Loss Prevention (DLP) controls, restrict outbound mail and cloud sync for sensitive categories, and instrument privileged access management (PAM) with session recording for high-risk roles.

- Web and Network Security: SSL/TLS misconfigurations and outdated components commonly lead to man-in-the-middle and application-layer exploits. Aurelio AI should perform continuous vulnerability scanning, remediate critical SSL/TLS issues, ensure certificates are properly configured and rotated, and maintain a timely patching cadence for web stacks and libraries.

- Phishing and Malware Resilience: Employee-targeted attacks remain a primary threat vector. A security posture combining technical controls (advanced email filtering, endpoint detection and response) with an ongoing user training program and phishing simulation reduces successful compromise.

- Secure Development and Supply Chain: As an AI provider, dependencies on third-party models, libraries, and cloud services introduce supply-chain risk. Implement secure SDLC practices: code reviews, static/dynamic analysis, dependency scanning, and provenance checks for third-party models. Conduct regular third-party risk assessments and contractual security requirements for vendors.

- Incident Response and Legal/Compliance Readiness: Absence of public incidents does not equate to preparedness. Aurelio AI should maintain an incident response plan, table-top exercises, centralized logging with sufficient retention, and mechanisms for timely customer and regulator notification. For companies operating across jurisdictions, align with applicable privacy laws and maintain data processing agreements and DPIAs where required.

- Monitoring and Testing: Continuous telemetry, baseline behavior analytics, and prioritized penetration testing (including red-team exercises) are necessary to detect and validate threats. Adopt a risk-based testing frequency and ensure remediation tracking to closure.

Recommended immediate actions (high priority)
1. Conduct a full external and internal security assessment (pen test and configuration audit), focusing on TLS/SSL, web app vulnerabilities, and cloud IAM.
2. Enforce MFA and rotate/revoke any exposed credentials; scan for credential reuse against breach datasets.
3. Deploy DLP controls and restrict exfiltration channels for sensitive data.
4. Initiate a secure SDLC program with automated dependency scanning and vulnerability patching.
5. Run phishing simulations and strengthen endpoint protections.

Conclusion: Is Aurelio AI Safe?
Aurelio AI cannot be rated as definitively safe without audited evidence; no public breach data was provided, but common industry weaknesses—credential compromise, SSL misconfigurations, insider risk, and insufficient monitoring—pose tangible threats. Immediate priorities are MFA, DLP, TLS remediation, IAM hardening, and an independent security assessment. Addressing these measures will materially lower financial, privacy, and reputational risk while demonstrating due diligence to customers and regulators.
Details
Industries:
Artificial Intelligence
Company size:
11-50 employees
Founded:
2020
Headquarters:
166 Geary St; 236; San Francisco, California 94108, US

Outcome reliability

We analyze billions of signals from publicly available sources to deliver validated insights into how your company is perceived externally by threat actors. These insights help security teams respond more quickly to risks, manage zero-day incidents effectively, and reduce overall exposure.

This is an inline graph showing outcome reliability scores. The grades are as follows: F is between 0 and 70, D is between 70 and 78, C is between 79 and 85, B is between 85 and 95, and A is above 95.