Get report
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Is Aktana safe?

Aktana risk score

Get detailed report
f

56/100

overall score

Total issues found:

1784
Updated on: December 3, 2025
Data we analyse
Phishing and malware
1256 issues

Network security
7 issues

Email security
124 issues

Website security
397 issues
Recent critical risk issues we found
309 corporate credentials stolen
124 domains vulnerable to email spoofing
391 SSL configuration issues found
Only 19% of systems CDN-protected
What information we check
Software patching
Web application security
Email security
Dark web exposure
Cybersecurity Benchmark
A comparison of this company’s cybersecurity ranking with industry averages and peer organizations
Phishing and malware
0 vs. 50

Network security
99 vs. 89

Email security
0 vs. 52

Website security
68 vs. 68
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Company overview
Section 1: Company Overview
Aktana is a technology firm that provides decision-support and engagement-optimization software primarily to commercial teams in the life sciences and healthcare sectors. Its platform combines analytics, workflow integration, and prescriptive recommendations to help field teams prioritize activities and engage healthcare professionals more effectively. As a vendor operating in a regulated environment and integrating with customer systems (CRM, analytics, and clinical data sources), Aktana routinely processes commercially sensitive and potentially regulated data, making information security and regulatory compliance central to its operations.

Section 2: Historical Data Breaches
No specific, verifiable public disclosures or internal breach reports for Aktana were provided in the source material. In the absence of documented incidents, there is no confirmed history of large-scale data compromises attributed to the company. That said, a lack of public reporting does not equate to absence of risk: many small incidents go undisclosed, and vendors in healthcare frequently face targeted reconnaissance and supply-chain probing. It is therefore prudent to assume exposure vectors consistent with SaaS providers in this sector unless proven otherwise by independent audit.

Section 3: Recent Security Breach
(omitted — no recent breach information was supplied)

Section 4: Evaluation of Digital Security
No granular assessment data (e.g., vulnerability counts, SSL findings, credential exposures, or an external security score) were provided alongside the brief. Given Aktana’s business model and typical integration profile, risk areas to evaluate and prioritize are clear:

- Identity and Access Management (IAM): SaaS platforms are frequently targeted via compromised credentials. Ensure multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all administrative and developer access, enforce strong password policies, restrict privileged accounts via just-in-time elevation, and implement role-based access control with regular entitlement reviews.

- Data Protection: Data in transit and at rest must be encrypted using up-to-date TLS configurations and strong cryptographic standards. Data classification and minimization should limit retention of sensitive customer or patient-identifiable information. For any data subject to healthcare regulations, map processing activities to applicable controls (HIPAA, GDPR) and document legal bases.

- Secure Integrations and APIs: As an integrator with CRMs and analytics platforms, Aktana should adopt strong API authentication, rate limiting, and schema validation to prevent abuse and injection attacks. Use of mutual TLS and signed tokens where feasible reduces exposure.

- Vulnerability Management and Configuration Hygiene: Regular automated scanning for dependencies, container images, and web application vulnerabilities is essential. SSL/TLS configurations should be assessed against current best practices (e.g., disabling obsolete cipher suites), and web application firewalls (WAF) should protect public endpoints.

- Supply Chain and Third-Party Risk: Vendor dependencies (libraries, cloud providers, third-party services) require continuous monitoring. Implement an SBOM (software bill of materials), patch cadence, and contractual security requirements for critical suppliers.

- Monitoring, Logging, and Incident Response: Centralized, immutable logging with 24/7 monitoring, alerting, and playbooks for incident response reduces dwell time. Retain logs for forensic timelines and conduct regular tabletop exercises with stakeholders and customers to validate response readiness.

- Employee Training and Insider Risk: Human error remains a leading cause of data exposure. Continuous security awareness training, phishing simulation, and clear policies for data handling reduce accidental leakage. Enforce least-privilege data access and monitor anomalous behavior for insider risk.

- Compliance and Independent Assurance: Seek SOC 2 Type II attestation or ISO 27001 certification and publish a security whitepaper and shared responsibility model. Regular third-party penetration tests and periodic red-team exercises provide external validation and identify configuration or logic vulnerabilities.

Recommendations for immediate priorities
1. Verify MFA and least-privilege controls for all accounts and services.
2. Conduct an external penetration test and a configuration audit of TLS/SSL, APIs, and public endpoints.
3. Begin or update a formal vulnerability management program with SLA-driven remediation.
4. Implement or refresh an incident response plan and run a tabletop exercise involving customers where integrations are critical.
5. Publish clear compliance posture (SOC 2/ISO) and a customer-facing security status page or trust center to improve transparency.

Conclusion: Is Aktana Safe?
Aktana’s role as a decision-support SaaS provider in life sciences creates elevated exposure to targeted threat actors and regulatory expectations. No public breaches were provided, but absence of disclosure is not proof of strong security. Immediate actions—MFA enforcement, external testing, hardened TLS, robust IAM, continuous monitoring, and independent compliance audits—will materially reduce risk. Prioritizing these steps balances operational continuity with protection of sensitive customer data and regulatory obligations.

500–600 character summary:
Aktana has no publicly disclosed breaches in the provided material, but as a healthcare-focused SaaS vendor it faces heightened risk from targeted attacks and integration vulnerabilities. Immediate measures—enforce MFA and least-privilege access, fix TLS/API configurations, run third-party pen tests, and obtain SOC 2/ISO certification—are essential. These controls will reduce financial, reputational, and privacy impacts while improving customer confidence and regulatory compliance.
Details
Industries:
Artificial Intelligence
Company size:
201-500 employees
Founded:
2008
Headquarters:
207 Powell St; Level 8; San Francisco, CA 94102, US

Outcome reliability

We analyze billions of signals from publicly available sources to deliver validated insights into how your company is perceived externally by threat actors. These insights help security teams respond more quickly to risks, manage zero-day incidents effectively, and reduce overall exposure.

This is an inline graph showing outcome reliability scores. The grades are as follows: F is between 0 and 70, D is between 70 and 78, C is between 79 and 85, B is between 85 and 95, and A is above 95.