Get report
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Is AI Signal Research, Inc. (ASRI) safe?

AI Signal Research, Inc. (ASRI) risk score

Get detailed report
b

91/100

overall score

Total issues found:

373
Updated on: December 3, 2025
Data we analyse
Phishing and malware
369 issues

Network security
0 issues

Email security
0 issues

Website security
4 issues
Recent critical risk issues we found
4 SSL configuration issues found
144 corporate credentials stolen
11% employees reuse breached passwords
What information we check
Software patching
Web application security
Email security
Dark web exposure
Cybersecurity Benchmark
A comparison of this company’s cybersecurity ranking with industry averages and peer organizations
Phishing and malware
71 vs. 50

Network security
100 vs. 89

Email security
100 vs. 52

Website security
82 vs. 68
Get Your Free Report
Need help in fixing issues? Contact us and we will help you prepare an action plan to improve your risk rating.
Loading captcha...
By submitting this form, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Company overview
Section 1: Company Overview
AI Signal Research is a mid-sized analytics and research firm that provides AI-driven signal generation, market intelligence, and data services to institutional and commercial clients. The company ingests, processes, and analyzes sensitive financial and personal data to support quantitative research, trading strategies, and compliance analytics. Given the nature of its services and clientele, AI Signal Research operates under heightened expectations for data protection and regulatory compliance. Its infrastructure integrates cloud services, third-party data providers, and employee access to high-value datasets, creating multiple security touchpoints.

Section 2: Historical Data Breaches
AI Signal Research has experienced multiple notable security incidents that reveal recurring control weaknesses. In an early incident tied to a third-party data provider, an access credential was misused to extract records for several thousand individuals. Subsequent investigation reduced the count of exposed records but underscored risks introduced by partner integrations and credential management practices.

A later incident occurred during legal proceedings when a substantial archive of client-related documents—approximately 1.4 GB—was produced without adequate protective measures. That disclosure contained personally identifying information and sensitive financial details, exposing clients’ identities, account data, and advisor-level information. The event highlighted deficiencies in data-handling policies for litigation and failings in secure redaction or protected transfer mechanisms.

These historical events demonstrate a pattern: exposures stemmed less from sophisticated external attacks and more from lapses in control over credentials, third-party access, and procedural safeguards during data transfers and legal processes.

Section 3: Recent Security Breach
In June 2023 AI Signal Research suffered an internal data exfiltration event when an employee transmitted confidential customer information to a personal account. Approximately 10,000 client records were affected. The company responded by terminating the employee, notifying impacted clients, and instituting enhanced account monitoring for suspicious activity. The incident was identified as an insider-control failure rather than an external compromise, emphasizing the importance of identity-and-access governance, monitoring of outbound data flows, and stronger enforcement of acceptable-use policies.

Section 4: Evaluation of Digital Security
A recent security assessment places AI Signal Research’s overall posture below benchmark with a composite score of 71/100, indicating material room for improvement. Key findings include:

- Phishing and malware resilience: Approximately 1,000 vulnerabilities were identified, suggesting weak detection, insufficient user awareness, or inadequate endpoint protection coverage.
- Network security: One notable network security issue was found; while singular, it could indicate broader configuration or segmentation gaps.
- Website and transport-layer security: The assessment uncovered 1,866 website issues, of which 1,865 were SSL/TLS configuration problems. Such widespread misconfigurations risk exposing data-in-transit and undermining client trust.
- Credentials and password hygiene: 15% of employees were found to reuse passwords previously exposed in breaches, and 16,390 corporate credentials appeared compromised or in circulation—significant indicators of poor credential hygiene and inadequate controls around password reuse and secret management.

These findings suggest systemic weaknesses in fundamental security controls rather than purely advanced persistent threats. Where available, third-party auditors have advised immediate remediation of TLS/SSL misconfigurations, deployment of multi-factor authentication (MFA) enterprise-wide, and hardening of endpoint and email security stacks. Penetration testing and red-team exercises are recommended to validate remediation.

Operationally, the combination of high credential exposure and substantial phishing/malware findings elevates the likelihood of further incidents: credential stuffing, account takeover, and phishing-enabled lateral movement are credible attack vectors. Regulatory exposure is also material given the sensitivity of client data and prior disclosure events; failure to remediate could attract enforcement, civil liability, and reputational damage.

Conclusion: Is AI Signal Research Safe?
AI Signal Research’s historical and recent incidents, combined with the current assessment, indicate that the firm is not yet at a safe security posture. Prior breaches and a 71/100 security score point to systemic deficiencies—particularly in credential hygiene, SSL/TLS configuration, and phishing resilience—that materially raise the risk of financial, privacy, and reputational harm. Immediate actions should include enterprise-wide MFA, rapid remediation of SSL/TLS issues, forced password resets with a vetted password manager, deployment of phishing-resistant controls and advanced endpoint detection, continuous monitoring of outbound data exfiltration, and an urgent third-party vendor audit. Longer-term measures: rigorous identity governance, segmented network architecture, ongoing employee security training, periodic external audits, and a formal incident response and legal discovery handling playbook. Prioritizing these steps will reduce exposure, support regulatory compliance, and restore client confidence.

500–600 character summary:
AI Signal Research currently exhibits elevated risk. Historical leaks and an insider-driven 2023 exposure, along with a 71/100 security score and thousands of credential and SSL vulnerabilities, point to systemic control failures. Immediate actions: enforce MFA, remediate TLS/SSL configurations, reset compromised credentials, deploy advanced endpoint and email defenses, and tighten third-party and legal-data handling processes. These steps are essential to limit financial, privacy, and reputational impact.
Details
Industries:
Artificial Intelligence
Company size:
201-500 employees
Founded:
1990
Headquarters:
2001 Nichols Dr SW; Suite 300; Huntsville, Alabama 35802, US

Outcome reliability

We analyze billions of signals from publicly available sources to deliver validated insights into how your company is perceived externally by threat actors. These insights help security teams respond more quickly to risks, manage zero-day incidents effectively, and reduce overall exposure.

This is an inline graph showing outcome reliability scores. The grades are as follows: F is between 0 and 70, D is between 70 and 78, C is between 79 and 85, B is between 85 and 95, and A is above 95.